TSTP Solution File: SET072+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SET072+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:26:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.36s 1.66s
% Output   : Refutation 1.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET072+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 01:08:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/1.00  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/1.00  Process 24693 was started by sandbox2 on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/1.00  Sun Jul 10 01:08:52 2022
% 0.43/1.00  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_24539_n009.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_24539_n009.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/1.00  set(auto2).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/1.00      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/1.00      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/1.00  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/1.00  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/1.00  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/1.00  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/1.00  clear(print_given).
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (44 formulas)
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/1.00  1 (all X all Y (subclass(X,Y) <-> (all U (member(U,X) -> member(U,Y))))) # label(subclass_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  2 (all X subclass(X,universal_class)) # label(class_elements_are_sets) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  3 (all X all Y (X = Y <-> subclass(X,Y) & subclass(Y,X))) # label(extensionality) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  4 (all U all X all Y (member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y)) <-> member(U,universal_class) & (U = X | U = Y))) # label(unordered_pair_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  5 (all X all Y member(unordered_pair(X,Y),universal_class)) # label(unordered_pair) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  6 (all X singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X,X)) # label(singleton_set_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  7 (all X all Y ordered_pair(X,Y) = unordered_pair(singleton(X),unordered_pair(X,singleton(Y)))) # label(ordered_pair_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  8 (all U all V all X all Y (member(ordered_pair(U,V),cross_product(X,Y)) <-> member(U,X) & member(V,Y))) # label(cross_product_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  9 (all X all Y (member(X,universal_class) & member(Y,universal_class) -> first(ordered_pair(X,Y)) = X & second(ordered_pair(X,Y)) = Y)) # label(first_second) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  10 (all X all Y all Z (member(Z,cross_product(X,Y)) -> Z = ordered_pair(first(Z),second(Z)))) # label(cross_product) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  11 (all X all Y (member(ordered_pair(X,Y),element_relation) <-> member(Y,universal_class) & member(X,Y))) # label(element_relation_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  12 (all X all Y all Z (member(Z,intersection(X,Y)) <-> member(Z,X) & member(Z,Y))) # label(intersection) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  13 (all X all Z (member(Z,complement(X)) <-> member(Z,universal_class) & -member(Z,X))) # label(complement) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  14 (all X all XR all Y restrict(XR,X,Y) = intersection(XR,cross_product(X,Y))) # label(restrict_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  15 (all X -member(X,null_class)) # label(null_class_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  16 (all X all Z (member(Z,domain_of(X)) <-> member(Z,universal_class) & restrict(X,singleton(Z),universal_class) != null_class)) # label(domain_of) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  17 (all X all U all V all W (member(ordered_pair(ordered_pair(U,V),W),rotate(X)) <-> member(ordered_pair(ordered_pair(U,V),W),cross_product(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),universal_class)) & member(ordered_pair(ordered_pair(V,W),U),X))) # label(rotate_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  18 (all X subclass(rotate(X),cross_product(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),universal_class))) # label(rotate) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  19 (all U all V all W all X (member(ordered_pair(ordered_pair(U,V),W),flip(X)) <-> member(ordered_pair(ordered_pair(U,V),W),cross_product(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),universal_class)) & member(ordered_pair(ordered_pair(V,U),W),X))) # label(flip_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  20 (all X subclass(flip(X),cross_product(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),universal_class))) # label(flip) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  21 (all X all Y all Z (member(Z,union(X,Y)) <-> member(Z,X) | member(Z,Y))) # label(union_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  22 (all X successor(X) = union(X,singleton(X))) # label(successor_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  23 (all X all Y (member(ordered_pair(X,Y),successor_relation) <-> member(X,universal_class) & member(Y,universal_class) & successor(X) = Y)) # label(successor_relation_defn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  24 (all Y inverse(Y) = domain_of(flip(cross_product(Y,universal_class)))) # label(inverse_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  25 (all Z range_of(Z) = domain_of(inverse(Z))) # label(range_of_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  26 (all X all XR image(XR,X) = range_of(restrict(XR,X,universal_class))) # label(image_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  27 (all X (inductive(X) <-> member(null_class,X) & subclass(image(successor_relation,X),X))) # label(inductive_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  28 (exists X (member(X,universal_class) & inductive(X) & (all Y (inductive(Y) -> subclass(X,Y))))) # label(infinity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  29 (all U all X (member(U,sum_class(X)) <-> (exists Y (member(U,Y) & member(Y,X))))) # label(sum_class_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  30 (all X (member(X,universal_class) -> member(sum_class(X),universal_class))) # label(sum_class) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  31 (all U all X (member(U,power_class(X)) <-> member(U,universal_class) & subclass(U,X))) # label(power_class_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  32 (all U (member(U,universal_class) -> member(power_class(U),universal_class))) # label(power_class) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  33 (all XR all YR subclass(compose(YR,XR),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))) # label(compose_defn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  34 (all XR all YR all U all V (member(ordered_pair(U,V),compose(YR,XR)) <-> member(U,universal_class) & member(V,image(YR,image(XR,singleton(U)))))) # label(compose_defn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  35 (all Z (member(Z,identity_relation) <-> (exists X (member(X,universal_class) & Z = ordered_pair(X,X))))) # label(identity_relation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  36 (all XF (function(XF) <-> subclass(XF,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) & subclass(compose(XF,inverse(XF)),identity_relation))) # label(function_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.01  37 (all X all XF (member(X,universal_class) & function(XF) -> member(image(XF,X),universal_class))) # label(replacement) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.01  38 (all X all Y (disjoint(X,Y) <-> (all U -(member(U,X) & member(U,Y))))) # label(disjoint_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.01  39 (all X (X != null_class -> (exists U (member(U,universal_class) & member(U,X) & disjoint(U,X))))) # label(regularity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.01  40 (all XF all Y apply(XF,Y) = sum_class(image(XF,singleton(Y)))) # label(apply_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.01  41 (exists XF (function(XF) & (all Y (member(Y,universal_class) -> Y = null_class | member(apply(XF,Y),Y))))) # label(choice) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.01  42 -(all X all Y all Z (member(X,universal_class) & member(Y,universal_class) & unordered_pair(X,Z) = unordered_pair(Y,Z) -> X = Y)) # label(right_cancellation) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.43/1.01  43 -inductive(A) | member(null_class,A) # label(inductive_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(27)].
% 0.43/1.01  44 inductive(c1) # label(infinity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(28)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: member(null_class,c1).  [resolve(43,a,44,a)].
% 0.43/1.01  45 -inductive(A) | subclass(c1,A) # label(infinity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(28)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: subclass(c1,c1).  [resolve(45,a,44,a)].
% 0.43/1.01  46 -inductive(A) | subclass(image(successor_relation,A),A) # label(inductive_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(27)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: subclass(image(successor_relation,c1),c1).  [resolve(46,a,44,a)].
% 0.43/1.01  47 inductive(A) | -member(null_class,A) | -subclass(image(successor_relation,A),A) # label(inductive_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(27)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: -member(null_class,A) | -subclass(image(successor_relation,A),A) | subclass(c1,A).  [resolve(47,a,45,a)].
% 0.43/1.01  48 -function(A) | subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) # label(function_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(36)].
% 0.43/1.01  49 function(c2) # label(choice) # label(axiom).  [clausify(41)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: subclass(c2,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)).  [resolve(48,a,49,a)].
% 0.43/1.01  50 -function(A) | subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation) # label(function_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(36)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: subclass(compose(c2,inverse(c2)),identity_relation).  [resolve(50,a,49,a)].
% 0.43/1.01  51 -member(A,universal_class) | -function(B) | member(image(B,A),universal_class) # label(replacement) # label(axiom).  [clausify(37)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: -member(A,universal_class) | member(image(c2,A),universal_class).  [resolve(51,b,49,a)].
% 0.43/1.01  52 function(A) | -subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) | -subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation) # label(function_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(36)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: -subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) | -subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation) | -member(B,universal_class) | member(image(A,B),universal_class).  [resolve(52,a,51,b)].
% 0.43/1.01  53 -disjoint(A,B) | -member(C,A) | -member(C,B) # label(disjoint_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(38)].
% 0.43/1.01  54 null_class = A | disjoint(f5(A),A) # label(regularity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(39)].
% 0.43/1.01  55 disjoint(A,B) | member(f4(A,B),A) # label(disjoint_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(38)].
% 0.43/1.01  56 disjoint(A,B) | member(f4(A,B),B) # label(disjoint_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(38)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: -member(A,f5(B)) | -member(A,B) | null_class = B.  [resolve(53,a,54,b)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: -member(A,B) | -member(A,C) | member(f4(B,C),B).  [resolve(53,a,55,a)].
% 0.43/1.01  Derived: -member(A,B) | -member(A,C) | member(f4(B,C),C).  [resolve(53,a,56,a)].
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.43/1.01  
% 0.43/1.01  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.43/1.01  Function symbol KB weights:  universal_class=1. null_class=1. successor_relation=1. identity_relation=1. element_relation=1. c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. ordered_pair=1. cross_product=1. image=1. unordered_pair=1. compose=1. intersection=1. union=1. apply=1. f1=1. f2=1. f4=1. singleton=1. flip=1. sum_class=1. domain_of=1. inverse=1. power_class=1. rotate=1. successor=1. complement=1. first=1. range_of=1. second=1. f3=1. f5=1. restrict=1.
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  % Starting search at 0.03 seconds.
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=45.000, iters=3354
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=39.000, iters=3359
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=30.000, iters=3355
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=29.000, iters=3351
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=28.000, iters=3388
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=27.000, iters=3333
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3346
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=24.000, iters=3337
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=23.000, iters=3512
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=22.000, iters=3352
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3345
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3570
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=19.000, iters=3416
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=18.000, iters=3598
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3385
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 111 (0.00 of 0.58 sec).
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3646
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=14.000, iters=3476
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=11.000, iters=3508
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=10.000, iters=3593
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Low Water (keep): wt=9.000, iters=3337
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 1.36/1.66  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.36/1.66  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  % Proof 1 at 0.66 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 1.36/1.66  % Length of proof is 18.
% 1.36/1.66  % Level of proof is 8.
% 1.36/1.66  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 1.36/1.66  % Given clauses 631.
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  4 (all U all X all Y (member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y)) <-> member(U,universal_class) & (U = X | U = Y))) # label(unordered_pair_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.36/1.66  42 -(all X all Y all Z (member(X,universal_class) & member(Y,universal_class) & unordered_pair(X,Z) = unordered_pair(Y,Z) -> X = Y)) # label(right_cancellation) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.36/1.66  59 member(c3,universal_class) # label(right_cancellation) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(42)].
% 1.36/1.66  60 member(c4,universal_class) # label(right_cancellation) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(42)].
% 1.36/1.66  71 unordered_pair(c4,c5) = unordered_pair(c3,c5) # label(right_cancellation) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(42)].
% 1.36/1.66  84 c4 != c3 # label(right_cancellation) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(42)].
% 1.36/1.66  128 -member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) | A = B | A = C # label(unordered_pair_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 1.36/1.66  129 member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) | -member(A,universal_class) | A != B # label(unordered_pair_defn) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 1.36/1.66  295 -member(c3,unordered_pair(c4,c4)).  [ur(128,b,84,a(flip),c,84,a(flip))].
% 1.36/1.66  301 member(c4,unordered_pair(A,B)) | c4 != A.  [resolve(129,b,60,a)].
% 1.36/1.66  302 member(c3,unordered_pair(A,B)) | c3 != A.  [resolve(129,b,59,a)].
% 1.36/1.66  10139 member(c4,unordered_pair(c4,A)).  [xx_res(301,b)].
% 1.36/1.66  10198 member(c4,unordered_pair(c3,c5)).  [para(71(a,1),10139(a,2))].
% 1.36/1.66  10231 c5 = c4.  [resolve(10198,a,128,a),flip(b),unit_del(a,84)].
% 1.36/1.66  10258 unordered_pair(c4,c4) = unordered_pair(c3,c4).  [back_rewrite(71),rewrite([10231(2),10231(5)])].
% 1.36/1.66  10291 -member(c3,unordered_pair(c3,c4)).  [back_rewrite(295),rewrite([10258(4)])].
% 1.36/1.66  10292 member(c3,unordered_pair(c3,A)).  [xx_res(302,b)].
% 1.36/1.66  10293 $F.  [resolve(10292,a,10291,a)].
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.36/1.66  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Given=631. Generated=17129. Kept=10200. proofs=1.
% 1.36/1.66  Usable=614. Sos=9185. Demods=137. Limbo=0, Disabled=504. Hints=0.
% 1.36/1.66  Megabytes=9.99.
% 1.36/1.66  User_CPU=0.66, System_CPU=0.02, Wall_clock=1.
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  ============================== end of search =========================
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  THEOREM PROVED
% 1.36/1.66  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 1.36/1.66  
% 1.36/1.66  Process 24693 exit (max_proofs) Sun Jul 10 01:08:53 2022
% 1.36/1.66  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------