TSTP Solution File: SET071-7 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SET071-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:23:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SET071-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 23:29:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.54  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS derived 978 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 494 clauses.
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS allocated 76934 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS spent	0:00:00.19 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.11 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 31 :
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.54  6[0:Inp] || subclass(u,v)* subclass(v,w)* -> subclass(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.54  14[0:Inp] || subclass(u,null_class)* -> equal(u,null_class).
% 0.19/0.54  19[0:Inp] ||  -> subclass(singleton(u),unordered_pair(v,u))*r.
% 0.19/0.54  20[0:Inp] ||  -> member(u,universal_class) equal(unordered_pair(v,u),singleton(v))**.
% 0.19/0.54  21[0:Inp] ||  -> member(u,universal_class) equal(unordered_pair(u,v),singleton(v))**.
% 0.19/0.54  22[0:Inp] || equal(unordered_pair(x__dfg,y__dfg),null_class)** -> .
% 0.19/0.54  23[0:Inp] || member(x__dfg,universal_class)* -> .
% 0.19/0.54  24[0:Inp] || member(y__dfg,universal_class)* -> .
% 0.19/0.54  25[0:Inp] || member(u,v)* subclass(v,w)* -> member(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.54  28[0:Inp] ||  -> subclass(u,universal_class)*.
% 0.19/0.54  32[0:Inp] || member(u,unordered_pair(v,w))* -> equal(u,w) equal(u,v).
% 0.19/0.54  36[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(unordered_pair(u,u),singleton(u))**.
% 0.19/0.54  90[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(u,null_class) member(regular(u),u)*.
% 0.19/0.54  121[0:Res:21.0,24.0] ||  -> equal(unordered_pair(y__dfg,u),singleton(u))**.
% 0.19/0.54  131[0:Res:20.0,23.0] ||  -> equal(unordered_pair(u,x__dfg),singleton(u))**.
% 0.19/0.54  132[0:Res:21.0,23.0] ||  -> equal(unordered_pair(x__dfg,u),singleton(u))**.
% 0.19/0.54  139[0:Res:25.2,23.0] || subclass(u,universal_class) member(x__dfg,u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.54  140[0:Res:14.1,22.0] || subclass(unordered_pair(x__dfg,y__dfg),null_class)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.54  158[0:Rew:132.0,140.0] || subclass(singleton(y__dfg),null_class)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.54  160[0:MRR:139.0,28.0] || member(x__dfg,u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.54  180[0:SpR:131.0,121.0] ||  -> equal(singleton(y__dfg),singleton(x__dfg))**.
% 0.19/0.54  183[0:Rew:180.0,158.0] || subclass(singleton(x__dfg),null_class)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.54  432[0:SpR:131.0,19.0] ||  -> subclass(singleton(x__dfg),singleton(u))*.
% 0.19/0.54  447[0:NCh:6.2,6.0,432.0,183.0] || equal(singleton(u),null_class)** -> .
% 0.19/0.54  1281[0:SpL:36.0,32.0] || member(u,singleton(v))* -> equal(u,v) equal(u,v).
% 0.19/0.54  1294[0:Obv:1281.1] || member(u,singleton(v))* -> equal(u,v).
% 0.19/0.54  1302[0:Res:90.1,1294.0] ||  -> equal(singleton(u),null_class) equal(regular(singleton(u)),u)**.
% 0.19/0.54  1307[0:MRR:1302.0,447.0] ||  -> equal(regular(singleton(u)),u)**.
% 0.19/0.54  1310[0:SpR:1307.0,90.1] ||  -> equal(singleton(u),null_class) member(u,singleton(u))*.
% 0.19/0.54  1335[0:MRR:1310.0,447.0] ||  -> member(u,singleton(u))*.
% 0.19/0.54  1336[0:UnC:1335.0,160.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.54  Formulae used in the proof : transitivity_of_subclass corollary_of_null_class_is_subclass singleton_in_unordered_pair2 unordered_pair_equals_singleton1 unordered_pair_equals_singleton2 prove_null_unordered_pair_1 prove_null_unordered_pair_2 prove_null_unordered_pair_3 subclass_members class_elements_are_sets unordered_pair_member singleton_set regularity1
% 0.19/0.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------