TSTP Solution File: SET065+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:48:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  15   ~;  13   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   5 sgn  15   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subclass(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',subclass_defn) ).

fof(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    ! [X1] : subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

fof(inductive_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( inductive(X1)
    <=> ( member(null_class,X1)
        & subclass(image(successor_relation,X1),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',inductive_defn) ).

fof(infinity,axiom,
    ? [X1] :
      ( member(X1,universal_class)
      & inductive(X1)
      & ! [X2] :
          ( inductive(X2)
         => subclass(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',infinity) ).

fof(null_class_is_a_set,conjecture,
    member(null_class,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',null_class_is_a_set) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subclass(X4,X5)
        | ~ member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,X5) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subclass(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subclass(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2] : subclass(X2,universal_class),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[class_elements_are_sets]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2,X2] :
      ( ( member(null_class,X2)
        | ~ inductive(X2) )
      & ( subclass(image(successor_relation,X2),X2)
        | ~ inductive(X2) )
      & ( ~ member(null_class,X2)
        | ~ subclass(image(successor_relation,X2),X2)
        | inductive(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inductive_defn])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( member(esk2_0,universal_class)
      & inductive(esk2_0)
      & ( ~ inductive(X4)
        | subclass(esk2_0,X4) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[infinity])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[null_class_is_a_set]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(null_class,X1)
    | ~ inductive(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    inductive(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    member(null_class,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 00:01:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.24/1.42  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.24/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 42
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 2
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.24/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 2
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 0.24/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.24/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 525
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.42  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 2716 pages
% 0.24/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.020 s
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 19
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 8
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 90
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 82
% 0.24/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 90
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 89
% 0.24/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 235
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 206
% 0.24/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 228
% 0.24/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 80
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.24/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 63
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 168
% 0.24/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 464
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.24/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 671
% 0.24/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 605
% 0.24/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 131
% 0.24/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10616
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42  # User time                : 0.024 s
% 0.24/1.42  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 3364 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------