TSTP Solution File: SET065+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:18:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  14   ~;  13   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   2 sgn;  14   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subclass(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1cRCbv3kBM/E---3.1_13062.p',subclass_defn) ).

fof(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    ! [X1] : subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1cRCbv3kBM/E---3.1_13062.p',class_elements_are_sets) ).

fof(inductive_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( inductive(X1)
    <=> ( member(null_class,X1)
        & subclass(image(successor_relation,X1),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1cRCbv3kBM/E---3.1_13062.p',inductive_defn) ).

fof(infinity,axiom,
    ? [X1] :
      ( member(X1,universal_class)
      & inductive(X1)
      & ! [X2] :
          ( inductive(X2)
         => subclass(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1cRCbv3kBM/E---3.1_13062.p',infinity) ).

fof(null_class_is_a_set,conjecture,
    member(null_class,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1cRCbv3kBM/E---3.1_13062.p',null_class_is_a_set) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( ~ subclass(X10,X11)
        | ~ member(X12,X10)
        | member(X12,X11) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X13,X14),X13)
        | subclass(X13,X14) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X13,X14),X14)
        | subclass(X13,X14) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X21] : subclass(X21,universal_class),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[class_elements_are_sets]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X24] :
      ( ( member(null_class,X24)
        | ~ inductive(X24) )
      & ( subclass(image(successor_relation,X24),X24)
        | ~ inductive(X24) )
      & ( ~ member(null_class,X24)
        | ~ subclass(image(successor_relation,X24),X24)
        | inductive(X24) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inductive_defn])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X75] :
      ( member(esk5_0,universal_class)
      & inductive(esk5_0)
      & ( ~ inductive(X75)
        | subclass(esk5_0,X75) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[infinity])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( member(null_class,X1)
    | ~ inductive(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    inductive(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[null_class_is_a_set])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    member(null_class,esk5_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SET065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:32:27 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1cRCbv3kBM/E---3.1_13062.p
% 0.21/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # sh5l with pid 13177 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 130s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 13188 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 130s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 83
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 83
% 0.21/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 104
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.21/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 96
% 0.21/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.21/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 208
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 184
% 0.21/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 201
% 0.21/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.21/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 9
% 0.21/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 89
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 24
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.21/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 63
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 162
% 0.21/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 405
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.21/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 591
% 0.21/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 526
% 0.21/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.21/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 49
% 0.21/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6589
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1996 pages
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------