TSTP Solution File: SET064+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET064+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:48:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (   6   ~;   6   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   1 sgn   5   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(null_class_is_unique,conjecture,
    ! [X5] :
      ( X5 = null_class
      | ? [X2] : member(X2,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',null_class_is_unique) ).

fof(regularity,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 != null_class
     => ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,universal_class)
          & member(X3,X1)
          & disjoint(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',regularity) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X5] :
        ( X5 = null_class
        | ? [X2] : member(X2,X5) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[null_class_is_unique]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X7] :
      ( esk8_0 != null_class
      & ~ member(X7,esk8_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ( member(esk6_1(X4),universal_class)
        | X4 = null_class )
      & ( member(esk6_1(X4),X4)
        | X4 = null_class )
      & ( disjoint(esk6_1(X4),X4)
        | X4 = null_class ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[regularity])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(X1,esk8_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | member(esk6_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    esk8_0 != null_class,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SET064+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 13:44:44 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.24/1.41  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.24/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 0.24/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 42
% 0.24/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 0.24/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.24/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 569
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.24/1.41  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.24/1.41  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.24/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 2724 pages
% 0.24/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 9
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 4
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 0.24/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 0.24/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 91
% 0.24/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.24/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 83
% 0.24/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 36
% 0.24/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 36
% 0.24/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.24/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 25
% 0.24/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 16
% 0.24/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 23
% 0.24/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 34
% 0.24/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.24/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.24/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 22
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 63
% 0.24/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 141
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.24/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 68
% 0.24/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 62
% 0.24/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5754
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.24/1.41  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.41  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.24/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 3100 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------