TSTP Solution File: SET064+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET064+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:21:54 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (   6   ~;   6   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   1 sgn;   5   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(null_class_is_unique,conjecture,
    ! [X5] :
      ( X5 = null_class
      | ? [X2] : member(X2,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CNaz3L8R93/E---3.1_10821.p',null_class_is_unique) ).

fof(regularity,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 != null_class
     => ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,universal_class)
          & member(X3,X1)
          & disjoint(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CNaz3L8R93/E---3.1_10821.p',regularity) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X5] :
        ( X5 = null_class
        | ? [X2] : member(X2,X5) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[null_class_is_unique]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X11] :
      ( esk1_0 != null_class
      & ~ member(X11,esk1_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X26] :
      ( ( member(esk3_1(X26),universal_class)
        | X26 = null_class )
      & ( member(esk3_1(X26),X26)
        | X26 = null_class )
      & ( disjoint(esk3_1(X26),X26)
        | X26 = null_class ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[regularity])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(X1,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( member(esk3_1(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != null_class,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem    : SET064+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:04:14 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CNaz3L8R93/E---3.1_10821.p
% 0.15/0.43  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # sh5l with pid 10905 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.43  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 130s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 10912 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Result found by G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.43  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 130s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 84
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 84
% 0.15/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 15
% 0.15/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.15/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 8
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.15/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 6
% 0.15/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.15/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 13
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.15/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 73
% 0.15/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 153
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.15/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3994
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 2004 pages
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.15/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------