TSTP Solution File: SET063+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SET063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:38:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.62s 1.83s
% Output : Proof 1.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SET063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 19:32:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.62/1.83 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.62/1.83 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 1.62/1.83 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 1.62/1.83 % SZS output start Proof
% 1.62/1.83 1. (member T_0 (null_class)) (-. (member T_0 (null_class))) ### Axiom
% 1.62/1.83 2. (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) (member T_0 (null_class)) ### All 1
% 1.62/1.83 3. (-. ((member T_0 (null_class)) => (member T_0 T_1))) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) ### NotImply 2
% 1.62/1.83 4. (-. (All U, ((member U (null_class)) => (member U T_1)))) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) ### NotAllEx 3
% 1.62/1.83 5. (-. (subclass (null_class) T_1)) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) ### Definition-Pseudo(subclass) 4
% 1.62/1.83 6. (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U (null_class)))) (-. (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U (null_class))))) ### Axiom
% 1.62/1.83 7. (-. (subclass T_1 (null_class))) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U (null_class)))) ### Definition-Pseudo(subclass) 6
% 1.62/1.83 8. (-. ((subclass (null_class) T_1) /\ (subclass T_1 (null_class)))) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U (null_class)))) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) ### NotAnd 5 7
% 1.62/1.83 9. (T_1 != (null_class)) ((null_class) = T_1) ### Sym(=)
% 1.62/1.84 10. (((null_class) = T_1) <=> ((subclass (null_class) T_1) /\ (subclass T_1 (null_class)))) (T_1 != (null_class)) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U (null_class)))) ### Equiv 8 9
% 1.62/1.84 11. (All Y, (((null_class) = Y) <=> ((subclass (null_class) Y) /\ (subclass Y (null_class))))) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U (null_class)))) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) (T_1 != (null_class)) ### All 10
% 1.62/1.84 12. (All X, (All Y, ((X = Y) <=> ((subclass X Y) /\ (subclass Y X))))) (T_1 != (null_class)) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U (null_class)))) ### All 11
% 1.62/1.84 13. (subclass T_1 (null_class)) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) (T_1 != (null_class)) (All X, (All Y, ((X = Y) <=> ((subclass X Y) /\ (subclass Y X))))) ### Definition-Pseudo(subclass) 12
% 1.62/1.84 14. (-. ((subclass T_1 (null_class)) => (T_1 = (null_class)))) (All X, (All Y, ((X = Y) <=> ((subclass X Y) /\ (subclass Y X))))) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) ### NotImply 13
% 1.62/1.84 15. (-. (All X, ((subclass X (null_class)) => (X = (null_class))))) (All X, (-. (member X (null_class)))) (All X, (All Y, ((X = Y) <=> ((subclass X Y) /\ (subclass Y X))))) ### NotAllEx 14
% 1.62/1.84 % SZS output end Proof
% 1.62/1.84 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------