TSTP Solution File: SET062+3 by leanCoP---2.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : leanCoP---2.2
% Problem  : SET062+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : leancop_casc.sh %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 02:50:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SET062+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 12:24:27 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.39  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/1.40  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/1.40  
% 0.24/1.40  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.40  fof(prove_empty_set_subset, conjecture, ! [_6378] : subset(empty_set, _6378), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_empty_set_subset)).
% 0.24/1.40  fof(empty_set_defn, axiom, ! [_6485] : ~ member(_6485, empty_set), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', empty_set_defn)).
% 0.24/1.40  fof(subset_defn, axiom, ! [_6602, _6605] : (subset(_6602, _6605) <=> ! [_6623] : (member(_6623, _6602) => member(_6623, _6605))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', subset_defn)).
% 0.24/1.40  
% 0.24/1.40  cnf(1, plain, [subset(empty_set, 3 ^ [])], clausify(prove_empty_set_subset)).
% 0.24/1.40  cnf(2, plain, [member(_3388, empty_set)], clausify(empty_set_defn)).
% 0.24/1.40  cnf(3, plain, [-(subset(_3580, _3636)), -(member(1 ^ [_3636, _3580], _3580))], clausify(subset_defn)).
% 0.24/1.40  
% 0.24/1.40  cnf('1',plain,[member(1 ^ [3 ^ [], empty_set], empty_set)],start(2,bind([[_3388], [1 ^ [3 ^ [], empty_set]]]))).
% 0.24/1.40  cnf('1.1',plain,[-(member(1 ^ [3 ^ [], empty_set], empty_set)), -(subset(empty_set, 3 ^ []))],extension(3,bind([[_3580, _3636], [empty_set, 3 ^ []]]))).
% 0.24/1.40  cnf('1.1.1',plain,[subset(empty_set, 3 ^ [])],extension(1)).
% 0.24/1.40  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------