TSTP Solution File: SET062+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SET062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 20 05:05:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SET062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Sep  3 01:48:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.34  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.18/0.34  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.18/0.34    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.18/0.34    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.18/0.34    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.18/0.34    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.18/0.34    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.18/0.34    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.18/0.34    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.18/0.34    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.18/0.34    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.18/0.34    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.18/0.34    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.40  tff(member_type, type, (
% 0.18/0.40     member: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(null_class_type, type, (
% 0.18/0.40     null_class: $i)).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(tptp_fun_U_0_type, type, (
% 0.18/0.40     tptp_fun_U_0: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(tptp_fun_X_7_type, type, (
% 0.18/0.40     tptp_fun_X_7: $i)).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(subclass_type, type, (
% 0.18/0.40     subclass: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(1,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (^[X: $i, Y: $i] : refl((~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))))) <=> (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(2,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))))) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(3,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (^[X: $i, Y: $i] : rewrite((~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))))) <=> (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(4,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))))) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(5,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))))) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[4, 2])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(6,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (^[X: $i, Y: $i] : trans(monotonicity(rewrite(((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y))) <=> ((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))), rewrite((subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))) <=> (subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))), ((((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y))) & (subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))) <=> (((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y))) & (subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))))), rewrite((((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y))) & (subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))) <=> (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))))), ((((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y))) & (subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))) <=> (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(7,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y))) & (subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y))))) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(8,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (subclass(X, Y) <=> ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y))) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (subclass(X, Y) <=> ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(9,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (^[X: $i, Y: $i] : rewrite((subclass(X, Y) <=> ![U: $i] : (member(U, X) => member(U, Y))) <=> (subclass(X, Y) <=> ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(10,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (subclass(X, Y) <=> ![U: $i] : (member(U, X) => member(U, Y))) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (subclass(X, Y) <=> ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[9])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(11,axiom,(![X: $i, Y: $i] : (subclass(X, Y) <=> ![U: $i] : (member(U, X) => member(U, Y)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax','subclass_defn')).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(12,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (subclass(X, Y) <=> ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[11, 10])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(13,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (subclass(X, Y) <=> ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 8])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(14,plain,(
% 0.18/0.40      ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y))) & (subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[13])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(15,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[14, 7])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(16,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[15, 5])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(17,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      ((~![X: $i, Y: $i] : (~((~((~subclass(X, Y)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, X)) | member(U, Y)))) | (~(subclass(X, Y) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), X)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(Y, X), Y)))))))) | (~((~((~subclass(null_class, X!7)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, null_class)) | member(U, X!7)))) | (~(subclass(null_class, X!7) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7)))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(18,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (~((~((~subclass(null_class, X!7)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, null_class)) | member(U, X!7)))) | (~(subclass(null_class, X!7) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7))))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[17, 16])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(19,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (((~((~subclass(null_class, X!7)) | ![U: $i] : ((~member(U, null_class)) | member(U, X!7)))) | (~(subclass(null_class, X!7) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7)))))) | (subclass(null_class, X!7) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7))))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(20,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (subclass(null_class, X!7) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7)))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[19, 18])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(21,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      ((~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X)) <=> (~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X))),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(22,axiom,(~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','null_class_is_subclass')).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(23,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X)),
% 0.18/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[22, 21])).
% 0.18/0.40  tff(24,plain,
% 0.18/0.40      (~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X)),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[23, 21])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(25,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X)),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[24, 21])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(26,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X)),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[25, 21])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(27,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X)),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[26, 21])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(28,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X)),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[27, 21])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(29,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (~![X: $i] : subclass(null_class, X)),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[28, 21])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(30,plain,(
% 0.18/0.41      ~subclass(null_class, X!7)),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[29])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(31,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      ((~(subclass(null_class, X!7) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7))))) | subclass(null_class, X!7) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7)))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(32,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      ((~(subclass(null_class, X!7) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7))))) | (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7)))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[31, 30])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(33,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (~((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[32, 20])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(34,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (((~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), X!7)) | member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(35,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class)),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[34, 33])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(36,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (^[X: $i] : refl((~member(X, null_class)) <=> (~member(X, null_class)))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(37,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (![X: $i] : (~member(X, null_class)) <=> ![X: $i] : (~member(X, null_class))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[36])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(38,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (![X: $i] : (~member(X, null_class)) <=> ![X: $i] : (~member(X, null_class))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(39,axiom,(![X: $i] : (~member(X, null_class))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax','null_class_defn')).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(40,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (![X: $i] : (~member(X, null_class))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[39, 38])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(41,plain,(
% 0.18/0.41      ![X: $i] : (~member(X, null_class))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[40])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(42,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      (![X: $i] : (~member(X, null_class))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[41, 37])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(43,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      ((~![X: $i] : (~member(X, null_class))) | (~member(tptp_fun_U_0(X!7, null_class), null_class))),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.18/0.41  tff(44,plain,
% 0.18/0.41      ($false),
% 0.18/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[43, 42, 35])).
% 0.18/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------