TSTP Solution File: SET059-6 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET059-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:15:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.63s 2.84s
% Output   : Refutation 2.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET059-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 02:37:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Mon Jul 11 02:37:08 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 28768.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 138 during input processing: 0 [copy,138,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  138 back subsumes 62.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.59  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.59  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.59  number of clauses in intial UL: 49
% 0.19/0.59  number of clauses initially in problem: 121
% 0.19/0.59  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 40
% 0.19/0.59  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 64
% 0.19/0.59  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.59  absolute distinct symbol count: 50
% 0.19/0.59     distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.19/0.59     distinct function count: 30
% 0.19/0.59     distinct constant count: 10
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.63/2.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.63/2.84  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Model 2 [ 1 1 2442 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Model 3 [ 2 1 6107 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Model 4 [ 1 1 5954 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Model 5 [ 5 1 6888 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Model 6 [ 14 1 10126 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.46 sec ----> 553 [binary,551.1,61.1] {-} $F.
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 2.
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.63/2.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.63/2.84  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  2 [] {+} -member(not_subclass_element(A,B),B)|subclass(A,B).
% 2.63/2.84  5 [] {+} -subclass(A,B)| -subclass(B,A)|A=B.
% 2.63/2.84  60 [] {-} x!=y.
% 2.63/2.84  61 [copy,60,flip.1] {+} y!=x.
% 2.63/2.84  136 [] {+} member(not_subclass_element(x,y),y).
% 2.63/2.84  137 [] {-} member(not_subclass_element(y,x),x).
% 2.63/2.84  229 [hyper,136,2] {-} subclass(x,y).
% 2.63/2.84  260 [hyper,137,2] {-} subclass(y,x).
% 2.63/2.84  551 [hyper,229,5,260] {-} y=x.
% 2.63/2.84  553 [binary,551.1,61.1] {-} $F.
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.63/2.84  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  ============ end of search ============
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  true clauses given           0      (0.0%)
% 2.63/2.84  false clauses given         13
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.63/2.84     3  0         3
% 2.63/2.84     5  6         4
% 2.63/2.84     6  2         2
% 2.63/2.84     7  13        10
% 2.63/2.84     8  11        11
% 2.63/2.84     9  21        11
% 2.63/2.84    10  7         25
% 2.63/2.84    11  34        21
% 2.63/2.84    12  4         15
% 2.63/2.84    13  26        24
% 2.63/2.84    14  3         18
% 2.63/2.84    15  6         8
% 2.63/2.84    16  2         12
% 2.63/2.84    17  1         11
% 2.63/2.84    18  0         5
% 2.63/2.84    19  0         6
% 2.63/2.84    20  0         4
% 2.63/2.84    21  0         8
% 2.63/2.84    22  1         1
% 2.63/2.84    23  0         5
% 2.63/2.84    24  0         2
% 2.63/2.84    27  0         23
% 2.63/2.84    29  0         11
% 2.63/2.84    30  0         6
% 2.63/2.84    31  0         12
% 2.63/2.84    32  0         11
% 2.63/2.84    33  0         3
% 2.63/2.84    34  0         9
% 2.63/2.84    36  0         1
% 2.63/2.84    37  0         1
% 2.63/2.84    39  0         1
% 2.63/2.84    46  0         2
% 2.63/2.84    48  0         4
% 2.63/2.84    50  0         2
% 2.63/2.84    55  0         1
% 2.63/2.84    57  0         2
% 2.63/2.84    59  0         1
% 2.63/2.84  tot:  137       296      (68.4% true)
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Model 6 [ 14 -7 10126 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Process 28768 finished Mon Jul 11 02:37:10 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------