TSTP Solution File: SET058-6 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SET058-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:08:20 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  13   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f119,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f110,f114,f118]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f115,f109]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(x,y)
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> subclass(x,y) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    subclass(x,y),
    inference(resolution,[],[f94,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0)
      | subclass(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_subclass_members1) ).

fof(f94,axiom,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(x,y),x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equality3_3) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    spl1_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f111,f103]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> subclass(y,x) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    subclass(y,x),
    inference(resolution,[],[f92,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1)
      | subclass(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_subclass_members2) ).

fof(f92,axiom,
    member(not_subclass_element(y,x),x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equality3_1) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f101,f107,f103]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(x,y)
    | ~ subclass(y,x) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f98,f99]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X1)
      | ~ subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f7,f97]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X1)
    <=> X0 = X1 ),
    introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ0_eqProxy])]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclass_implies_equal) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ~ sQ0_eqProxy(y,x),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f93,f97]) ).

fof(f93,axiom,
    y != x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equality3_2) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SET058-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 13:17:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.14/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.75  % (31341)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.59/0.75  % (31333)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.59/0.75  % (31335)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.59/0.75  % (31341)First to succeed.
% 0.59/0.75  % (31334)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.59/0.75  % (31336)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.59/0.75  % (31339)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.59/0.75  % (31338)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.59/0.75  % (31340)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.59/0.75  % (31341)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-31205"
% 0.59/0.75  % (31336)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (31336)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.75  % (31336)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.59/0.75  % (31336)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.59/0.75  
% 0.59/0.75  % (31336)Memory used [KB]: 1062
% 0.59/0.75  % (31336)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.59/0.75  % (31336)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.59/0.76  % (31336)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.76  % (31336)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.76  % (31339)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.59/0.76  % (31333)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.59/0.76  % (31340)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.59/0.76  % (31341)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.59/0.76  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.76  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.76  % (31341)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.76  % (31341)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.59/0.76  % (31341)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.59/0.76  
% 0.59/0.76  % (31341)Memory used [KB]: 1097
% 0.59/0.76  % (31341)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.59/0.76  % (31341)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.59/0.76  % (31205)Success in time 0.386 s
% 0.59/0.76  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------