TSTP Solution File: SET055+1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SET055+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:57:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    5 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   0 sgn   2   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(reflexivity,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : X1 = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : X1 = X1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[reflexivity]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    esk8_0 != esk8_0,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SET055+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 21:45:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.39  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.21/0.39  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.21/0.39  #
% 0.21/0.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.39  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.39  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.39  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------