TSTP Solution File: SET054-7 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SET054-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:56:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   2 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(equal_implies_subclass2,axiom,
    ( subclass(X2,X1)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',equal_implies_subclass2) ).

cnf(prove_subclass_is_reflexive_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(x,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_is_reflexive_1) ).

cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
    ( subclass(X2,X1)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    equal_implies_subclass2 ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(x,x),
    prove_subclass_is_reflexive_1 ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    subclass(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET054-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 06:21:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.38  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.13/0.38  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.13/0.38  #
% 0.13/0.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.38  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------