TSTP Solution File: SET054-7 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SET054-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:18:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.27s 300.20s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(equal_implies_subclass2,axiom,
( subclass(X2,X1)
| X1 != X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BQDBJ1Z79H/E---3.1_32720.p',equal_implies_subclass2) ).
cnf(prove_subclass_is_reflexive_1,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(x,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BQDBJ1Z79H/E---3.1_32720.p',prove_subclass_is_reflexive_1) ).
cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
( subclass(X2,X1)
| X1 != X2 ),
equal_implies_subclass2 ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(x,x),
prove_subclass_is_reflexive_1 ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
subclass(X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SET054-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 16:47:14 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BQDBJ1Z79H/E---3.1_32720.p
% 0.27/300.20 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.27/300.20 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/300.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # new_bool_3 with pid 343 completed with status 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.27/300.20 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/300.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/300.20 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/300.20 # partial match(1): FHUSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/300.20 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 347 completed with status 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Result found by G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.27/300.20 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/300.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/300.20 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/300.20 # partial match(1): FHUSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/300.20 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/300.20 # Starting G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.27/300.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.27/300.20 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.27/300.20
% 0.27/300.20 # Proof found!
% 0.27/300.20 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.27/300.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/300.20 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.27/300.20 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 85
% 0.27/300.20 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.27/300.20 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 0.27/300.20 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.27/300.20 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.27/300.20 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.27/300.20 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.27/300.20 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.27/300.20 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.27/300.20 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # NegExts : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.27/300.20 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.27/300.20 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/300.20 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/300.20 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/300.20 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/300.20 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/300.20 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/300.20 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.27/300.20 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.27/300.20 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% 0.27/300.20 # ...number of literals in the above : 19
% 0.27/300.20 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.27/300.20 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.27/300.20 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.27/300.20 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/300.20 # Termbank termtop insertions : 856
% 0.27/300.20
% 0.27/300.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/300.20 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.27/300.20 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.27/300.20 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.27/300.20 # Maximum resident set size: 1868 pages
% 0.27/300.20
% 0.27/300.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/300.20 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/300.20 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.27/300.20 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.27/300.20 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.27/300.20 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.27/300.20 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------