TSTP Solution File: SET054+1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SET054+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 03:31:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 17 ~; 9 |; 3 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(extensionality,axiom,
! [X,Y] :
( X = Y
<=> ( subclass(X,Y)
& subclass(Y,X) ) ) ).
fof(reflexivity_of_subclass,conjecture,
! [X] : subclass(X,X) ).
fof(subgoal_0,plain,
! [X] : subclass(X,X),
inference(strip,[],[reflexivity_of_subclass]) ).
fof(negate_0_0,plain,
~ ! [X] : subclass(X,X),
inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).
fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
? [X] : ~ subclass(X,X),
inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).
fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
~ subclass(skolemFOFtoCNF_X_2,skolemFOFtoCNF_X_2),
inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).
fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
! [X,Y] :
( X != Y
<=> ( ~ subclass(X,Y)
| ~ subclass(Y,X) ) ),
inference(canonicalize,[],[extensionality]) ).
fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
! [X,Y] :
( X != Y
<=> ( ~ subclass(X,Y)
| ~ subclass(Y,X) ) ),
inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).
fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
! [X,Y] :
( ( X != Y
| subclass(X,Y) )
& ( X != Y
| subclass(Y,X) )
& ( ~ subclass(X,Y)
| ~ subclass(Y,X)
| X = Y ) ),
inference(clausify,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).
fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
! [X,Y] :
( X != Y
| subclass(X,Y) ),
inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
~ subclass(skolemFOFtoCNF_X_2,skolemFOFtoCNF_X_2),
inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( X != Y
| subclass(X,Y) ),
inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
( Y != Y
| subclass(Y,Y) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_1:[bind(X,$fot(Y))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
Y = Y,
introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(Y)]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
subclass(Y,Y),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(Y,Y) )],[refute_0_3,refute_0_2]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
subclass(skolemFOFtoCNF_X_2,skolemFOFtoCNF_X_2),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(Y,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_X_2))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( subclass(skolemFOFtoCNF_X_2,skolemFOFtoCNF_X_2) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET054+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 01:44:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.19/0.41 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------