%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET054+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:08:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.61s 2.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   2 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ze_zj2c/lgb.p',i_0_28) ).

cnf(i_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(esk5_0,esk5_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ze_zj2c/lgb.p',i_0_59) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    i_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(esk5_0,esk5_0),
    i_0_59 ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    subclass(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET054+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 01:41:48 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.61/2.38  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.61/2.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.61/2.38  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.61/2.38  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0026_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S
% 7.61/2.38  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.61/2.38  #
% 7.61/2.38  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 7.61/2.38  
% 7.61/2.38  # Proof found!
% 7.61/2.38  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.61/2.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.61/2.38  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.61/2.38  
% 7.61/2.38  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.61/2.38  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 7.61/2.38  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.61/2.38  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 7.61/2.38  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.61/2.38  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------