TSTP Solution File: SET047+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SET047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:23:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   72 (  29   ~;  36   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (  33   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f120,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f19,f20,f113,f119]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f114,f12,f16]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> set_equal(sK2,sK1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> set_equal(sK1,sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f13,f108]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ set_equal(X2,X1)
      | set_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ set_equal(X2,X1)
      | ~ set_equal(X2,X1)
      | set_equal(X1,X2)
      | set_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f89,f68]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( element(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | set_equal(X0,X1)
      | ~ set_equal(X1,X0) ),
    inference(factoring,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( element(sK0(X0,X1),X2)
      | element(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | ~ set_equal(X1,X2)
      | set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f7,f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(X2,X0)
      | ~ set_equal(X0,X1)
      | element(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_equal(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,X0)
        <=> element(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel43_1) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( element(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | element(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(sK0(X1,X0),X1)
      | set_equal(X1,X0)
      | ~ set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(sK0(X1,X0),X1)
      | ~ set_equal(X0,X1)
      | set_equal(X1,X0)
      | ~ set_equal(X0,X1)
      | set_equal(X1,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f75,f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | ~ element(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X6,X4,X5] :
      ( element(sK0(X4,X5),X6)
      | ~ set_equal(X5,X4)
      | set_equal(X4,X5)
      | ~ set_equal(X6,X4) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f68,f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(X2,X1)
      | element(X2,X0)
      | ~ set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f111,f16,f12]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f108,f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f9,f16,f12]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( set_equal(sK2,sK1)
    | set_equal(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( set_equal(X0,X1)
    <~> set_equal(X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( set_equal(X1,X0)
      <=> set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_equal(X1,X0)
    <=> set_equal(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel43) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f16,f12]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( ~ set_equal(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ set_equal(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem    : SET047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 13:02:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.47  % (20433)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/7Mi)
% 0.18/0.48  % (20443)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/59Mi)
% 0.18/0.48  % (20426)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/191324Mi)
% 0.18/0.48  TRYING [1]
% 0.18/0.48  % (20437)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.18/0.48  TRYING [2]
% 0.18/0.48  TRYING [3]
% 0.18/0.48  TRYING [4]
% 0.18/0.48  TRYING [5]
% 0.18/0.48  % (20437)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.49  TRYING [6]
% 0.18/0.49  TRYING [7]
% 0.18/0.49  % (20452)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (20451)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/500Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  TRYING [1]
% 0.18/0.49  TRYING [2]
% 0.18/0.49  TRYING [3]
% 0.18/0.49  TRYING [8]
% 0.18/0.49  TRYING [4]
% 0.18/0.49  TRYING [5]
% 0.18/0.49  % (20433)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.49  
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)Time elapsed: 0.100 s
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  % (20437)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  % (20425)Success in time 0.155 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------