TSTP Solution File: SET046+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SET046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:48:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 15 ~; 11 |; 4 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel42,conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
! [X2] :
( element(X2,X1)
<=> ~ ? [X3] :
( element(X2,X3)
& element(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',pel42) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ? [X1] :
! [X2] :
( element(X2,X1)
<=> ~ ? [X3] :
( element(X2,X3)
& element(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel42]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X5,X6,X5] :
( ( ~ element(X5,esk1_0)
| ~ element(X5,X6)
| ~ element(X6,X5) )
& ( element(X5,esk2_1(X5))
| element(X5,esk1_0) )
& ( element(esk2_1(X5),X5)
| element(X5,esk1_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ element(X1,X2)
| ~ element(X2,X1)
| ~ element(X2,esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( element(X1,esk1_0)
| element(esk2_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( element(esk1_0,esk1_0)
| ~ element(esk2_1(esk1_0),X1)
| ~ element(X1,esk2_1(esk1_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( element(X1,esk1_0)
| element(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
element(esk1_0,esk1_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_4]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ element(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ element(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SET046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 18:25:13 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 280
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2760 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------