TSTP Solution File: SET046+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SET046+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:21:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 15 ~; 11 |; 4 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn; 4 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel42,conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
! [X2] :
( element(X2,X1)
<=> ~ ? [X3] :
( element(X2,X3)
& element(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7wCgozIWaC/E---3.1_4017.p',pel42) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ? [X1] :
! [X2] :
( element(X2,X1)
<=> ~ ? [X3] :
( element(X2,X3)
& element(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel42]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( ~ element(X5,esk1_0)
| ~ element(X5,X6)
| ~ element(X6,X5) )
& ( element(X5,esk2_1(X5))
| element(X5,esk1_0) )
& ( element(esk2_1(X5),X5)
| element(X5,esk1_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ element(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ element(X1,X2)
| ~ element(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( element(esk2_1(X1),X1)
| element(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( element(esk1_0,esk1_0)
| ~ element(X1,esk2_1(esk1_0))
| ~ element(esk2_1(esk1_0),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( element(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| element(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
element(esk1_0,esk1_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ element(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ element(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : SET046+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 16:43:06 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7wCgozIWaC/E---3.1_4017.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # new_bool_1 with pid 4096 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4099 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 291
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1600 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1664 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------