TSTP Solution File: SET027-6 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SET027-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:21:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
( member(X3,X2)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2UGuujrihu/E---3.1_6210.p',subclass_members) ).
cnf(prove_transitivity_of_subclass_2,negated_conjecture,
subclass(y,z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2UGuujrihu/E---3.1_6210.p',prove_transitivity_of_subclass_2) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2UGuujrihu/E---3.1_6210.p',not_subclass_members2) ).
cnf(prove_transitivity_of_subclass_1,negated_conjecture,
subclass(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2UGuujrihu/E---3.1_6210.p',prove_transitivity_of_subclass_1) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2UGuujrihu/E---3.1_6210.p',not_subclass_members1) ).
cnf(prove_transitivity_of_subclass_3,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(x,z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2UGuujrihu/E---3.1_6210.p',prove_transitivity_of_subclass_3) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( member(X3,X2)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,X1) ),
subclass_members ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
subclass(y,z),
prove_transitivity_of_subclass_2 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
not_subclass_members2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,z)
| ~ member(X1,y) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
subclass(x,y),
prove_transitivity_of_subclass_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( subclass(X1,z)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,z),y) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,y)
| ~ member(X1,x) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( subclass(X1,z)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,z),x) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
not_subclass_members1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(x,z),
prove_transitivity_of_subclass_3 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SET027-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.08/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 17:13:43 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2UGuujrihu/E---3.1_6210.p
% 0.14/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 6287 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.14/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.42 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 6295 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.14/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.42 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.42 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 94
% 0.14/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Initial clauses : 94
% 0.14/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 15
% 0.14/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 79
% 0.14/0.42 # Processed clauses : 134
% 0.14/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 134
% 0.14/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.14/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Generated clauses : 51
% 0.14/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 45
% 0.14/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Paramodulations : 48
% 0.14/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.14/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 0.14/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.14/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 39
% 0.14/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 68
% 0.14/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 165
% 0.14/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 93
% 0.14/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1398
% 0.14/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 681
% 0.14/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.14/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.14/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.14/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6069
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.42 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1940 pages
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 # User time : 0.059 s
% 0.14/0.42 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Total time : 0.066 s
% 0.14/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.14/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------