TSTP Solution File: SET027+3 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : SET027+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:34:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET027+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 04:52:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/0.54  # Version:  1.3
% 0.37/0.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.37/0.54  fof(prove_transitivity_of_subset,conjecture,(![B]:(![C]:(![D]:((subset(B,C)&subset(C,D))=>subset(B,D))))),input).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![B]:(![C]:(![D]:((subset(B,C)&subset(C,D))=>subset(B,D)))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[prove_transitivity_of_subset])).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(?[B]:(?[C]:(?[D]:((subset(B,C)&subset(C,D))&~subset(B,D))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c0])).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:((subset(X2,X3)&subset(X3,X4))&~subset(X2,X4))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c1])).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,((subset(skolem0001,skolem0002)&subset(skolem0002,skolem0003))&~subset(skolem0001,skolem0003)),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c2])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,~subset(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(subset_defn,axiom,(![B]:(![C]:(subset(B,C)<=>(![D]:(member(D,B)=>member(D,C)))))),input).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(c9,axiom,(![B]:(![C]:((~subset(B,C)|(![D]:(~member(D,B)|member(D,C))))&((?[D]:(member(D,B)&~member(D,C)))|subset(B,C))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[subset_defn])).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(c10,axiom,((![B]:(![C]:(~subset(B,C)|(![D]:(~member(D,B)|member(D,C))))))&(![B]:(![C]:((?[D]:(member(D,B)&~member(D,C)))|subset(B,C))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c9])).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(c11,axiom,((![X6]:(![X7]:(~subset(X6,X7)|(![X8]:(~member(X8,X6)|member(X8,X7))))))&(![X9]:(![X10]:((?[X11]:(member(X11,X9)&~member(X11,X10)))|subset(X9,X10))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c10])).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(c13,axiom,(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:((~subset(X6,X7)|(~member(X8,X6)|member(X8,X7)))&((member(skolem0004(X9,X10),X9)&~member(skolem0004(X9,X10),X10))|subset(X9,X10)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c12,axiom,((![X6]:(![X7]:(~subset(X6,X7)|(![X8]:(~member(X8,X6)|member(X8,X7))))))&(![X9]:(![X10]:((member(skolem0004(X9,X10),X9)&~member(skolem0004(X9,X10),X10))|subset(X9,X10))))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c11])).])).
% 0.37/0.54  fof(c14,axiom,(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:((~subset(X6,X7)|(~member(X8,X6)|member(X8,X7)))&((member(skolem0004(X9,X10),X9)|subset(X9,X10))&(~member(skolem0004(X9,X10),X10)|subset(X9,X10))))))))),inference(distribute,status(thm),[c13])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c17,axiom,~member(skolem0004(X19,X18),X18)|subset(X19,X18),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c14])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c5,negated_conjecture,subset(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c15,axiom,~subset(X15,X16)|~member(X17,X15)|member(X17,X16),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c14])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c4,negated_conjecture,subset(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c16,axiom,member(skolem0004(X14,X13),X14)|subset(X14,X13),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c14])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c18,plain,member(skolem0004(skolem0001,skolem0003),skolem0001),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c16, c6])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c20,plain,~subset(skolem0001,X21)|member(skolem0004(skolem0001,skolem0003),X21),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c18, c15])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c23,plain,member(skolem0004(skolem0001,skolem0003),skolem0002),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c20, c4])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c29,plain,~subset(skolem0002,X30)|member(skolem0004(skolem0001,skolem0003),X30),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c23, c15])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c45,plain,member(skolem0004(skolem0001,skolem0003),skolem0003),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c29, c5])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c47,plain,subset(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c45, c17])).
% 0.37/0.54  cnf(c59,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c47, c6])).
% 0.37/0.54  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.37/0.54  
% 0.37/0.54  # Initial clauses    : 7
% 0.37/0.54  # Processed clauses  : 18
% 0.37/0.54  # Factors computed   : 1
% 0.37/0.54  # Resolvents computed: 41
% 0.37/0.54  # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.37/0.54  # Forward subsumed   : 7
% 0.37/0.54  # Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.37/0.54  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.37/0.54  # User time          : 0.187 s
% 0.37/0.54  # System time        : 0.017 s
% 0.37/0.54  # Total time         : 0.204 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------