TSTP Solution File: SET027+3 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SET027+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:12:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.86s 2.08s
% Output   : Refutation 1.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   8 unt;   1 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | member(C,B) ),
    file('SET027+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | ~ member(dollar_f1(A,B),B) ),
    file('SET027+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ~ subset(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    file('SET027+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | member(dollar_f1(A,B),A) ),
    file('SET027+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    subset(dollar_c3,dollar_c2),
    file('SET027+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    subset(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('SET027+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    member(dollar_f1(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,3')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    member(dollar_f1(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),dollar_c2),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[8,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,8,1,6')] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    member(dollar_f1(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,1,7]),
    [iquote('hyper,9,1,7')] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    subset(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[11,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,11,2')] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[13,3]),
    [iquote('binary,13.1,3.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SET027+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 10:45:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.86/2.08  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.86/2.08  The process was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 1.86/2.08  Wed Jul 27 10:45:42 2022
% 1.86/2.08  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 13690.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.86/2.08  set(auto).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.86/2.08  clear(print_given).
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  formula_list(usable).
% 1.86/2.08  all B C (subset(B,C)<-> (all D (member(D,B)->member(D,C)))).
% 1.86/2.08  all B subset(B,B).
% 1.86/2.08  -(all B C D (subset(B,C)&subset(C,D)->subset(B,D))).
% 1.86/2.08  end_of_list.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  list(usable).
% 1.86/2.08  0 [] -subset(B,C)| -member(D,B)|member(D,C).
% 1.86/2.08  0 [] subset(B,C)|member($f1(B,C),B).
% 1.86/2.08  0 [] subset(B,C)| -member($f1(B,C),C).
% 1.86/2.08  0 [] subset(B,B).
% 1.86/2.08  0 [] subset($c3,$c2).
% 1.86/2.08  0 [] subset($c2,$c1).
% 1.86/2.08  0 [] -subset($c3,$c1).
% 1.86/2.08  end_of_list.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.86/2.08  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.86/2.08  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.86/2.08     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  ------------> process usable:
% 1.86/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 1 [] -subset(A,B)| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 1.86/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] subset(A,B)| -member($f1(A,B),B).
% 1.86/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [] -subset($c3,$c1).
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  ------------> process sos:
% 1.86/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 4 [] subset(A,B)|member($f1(A,B),A).
% 1.86/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 5 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.86/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 6 [] subset($c3,$c2).
% 1.86/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 7 [] subset($c2,$c1).
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 14 [binary,13.1,3.1] $F.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.86/2.08  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.86/2.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.86/2.08  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  ============ end of search ============
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.86/2.08  clauses given                  7
% 1.86/2.08  clauses generated              8
% 1.86/2.08  clauses kept                  13
% 1.86/2.08  clauses forward subsumed       2
% 1.86/2.08  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.86/2.08  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.86/2.08  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.86/2.08  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.86/2.08  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.86/2.08  
% 1.86/2.08  Process 13690 finished Wed Jul 27 10:45:43 2022
% 1.86/2.08  Otter interrupted
% 1.86/2.08  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------