TSTP Solution File: SET027+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SET027+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ck0pNpVqIp true
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:11:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 5 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 102 ( 11 ~; 11 |; 2 &; 74 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 ^; 23 !; 0 ?; 23 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(member_type,type,
member: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__7_type,type,
sk__7: $i ).
thf(subclass_type,type,
subclass: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__9_type,type,
sk__9: $i ).
thf(sk__8_type,type,
sk__8: $i ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(transitivity,conjecture,
! [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
( ( ( subclass @ X @ Y )
& ( subclass @ Y @ Z ) )
=> ( subclass @ X @ Z ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
( ( ( subclass @ X @ Y )
& ( subclass @ Y @ Z ) )
=> ( subclass @ X @ Z ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[transitivity]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl89,plain,
~ ( subclass @ sk__7 @ sk__9 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(subclass_defn,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( subclass @ X @ Y )
<=> ! [U: $i] :
( ( member @ U @ X )
=> ( member @ U @ Y ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( subclass @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( member @ ( sk_ @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl90,plain,
subclass @ sk__8 @ sk__9,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( member @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( member @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( subclass @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl427,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( member @ X0 @ sk__9 )
| ~ ( member @ X0 @ sk__8 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl90,zip_derived_cl0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( subclass @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( member @ ( sk_ @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl512,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( member @ ( sk_ @ sk__9 @ X0 ) @ sk__8 )
| ( subclass @ X0 @ sk__9 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl427,zip_derived_cl1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl91,plain,
subclass @ sk__7 @ sk__8,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0_001,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( member @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( member @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( subclass @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[subclass_defn]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl426,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( member @ X0 @ sk__8 )
| ~ ( member @ X0 @ sk__7 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl91,zip_derived_cl0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl593,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( subclass @ X0 @ sk__9 )
| ~ ( member @ ( sk_ @ sk__9 @ X0 ) @ sk__7 ) ),
inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl512,zip_derived_cl426]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl608,plain,
( ( subclass @ sk__7 @ sk__9 )
| ( subclass @ sk__7 @ sk__9 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl2,zip_derived_cl593]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl609,plain,
subclass @ sk__7 @ sk__9,
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl608]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl611,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl89,zip_derived_cl609]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET027+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ck0pNpVqIp true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 14:01:56 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.79 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.57/0.79 % BCE start: 92
% 0.57/0.79 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.57/0.79 % PE start: 92
% 0.57/0.79 logic: eq
% 0.57/0.79 % PE eliminated: 5
% 0.57/0.79 % done 86 iterations in 0.043s
% 0.57/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.79
% 0.57/0.79
% 0.57/0.79 % Terminating...
% 1.66/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 1.66/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------