TSTP Solution File: SET025-9 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SET025-9 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rXWfFR3Zm5 true

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:11:56 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET025-9 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rXWfFR3Zm5 true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 13:33:35 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.22/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.80  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.22/0.80  % BCE start: 143
% 0.22/0.80  % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.22/0.80  % PE start: 142
% 0.22/0.80  logic: eq
% 0.22/0.80  % PE eliminated: 11
% 0.22/0.80  % done 41 iterations in 0.050s
% 0.22/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.22/0.80  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.80  thf(singleton_set_type, type, singleton_set: $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(non_ordered_pair_type, type, non_ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(ordered_pair_type, type, ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(f3_type, type, f3: $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(ordered_pair_predicate_type, type, ordered_pair_predicate: $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(little_set_type, type, little_set: $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(f2_type, type, f2: $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(prove_predicate_is_small, conjecture, (little_set @ a)).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( little_set @ a )),
% 0.22/0.80    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_predicate_is_small])).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl142, plain, (~ (little_set @ a)),
% 0.22/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(ordered_pair_predicate3, axiom,
% 0.22/0.80    (( ~( ordered_pair_predicate @ X ) ) | 
% 0.22/0.80     ( ( X ) = ( ordered_pair @ ( f2 @ X ) @ ( f3 @ X ) ) ))).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.22/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.80         (~ (ordered_pair_predicate @ X0)
% 0.22/0.80          | ((X0) = (ordered_pair @ (f2 @ X0) @ (f3 @ X0))))),
% 0.22/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ordered_pair_predicate3])).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(ordered_pair, axiom,
% 0.22/0.80    (( ordered_pair @ X @ Y ) =
% 0.22/0.80     ( non_ordered_pair @ ( singleton_set @ X ) @ ( non_ordered_pair @ X @ Y ) ))).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.22/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.80         ((ordered_pair @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.22/0.80           = (non_ordered_pair @ (singleton_set @ X0) @ 
% 0.22/0.80              (non_ordered_pair @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.22/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ordered_pair])).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(non_ordered_pair4, axiom, (little_set @ ( non_ordered_pair @ X @ Y ))).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.22/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (little_set @ (non_ordered_pair @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.22/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [non_ordered_pair4])).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1053, plain,
% 0.22/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (little_set @ (ordered_pair @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.22/0.80      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1061, plain,
% 0.22/0.80      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (ordered_pair_predicate @ X0) |  (little_set @ X0))),
% 0.22/0.80      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl1053])).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(an_ordered_pair_predicate, axiom, (ordered_pair_predicate @ a)).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl141, plain, ( (ordered_pair_predicate @ a)),
% 0.22/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [an_ordered_pair_predicate])).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1063, plain, ( (little_set @ a)),
% 0.22/0.80      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)],
% 0.22/0.80                [zip_derived_cl1061, zip_derived_cl141])).
% 0.22/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1066, plain, ($false),
% 0.22/0.80      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl142, zip_derived_cl1063])).
% 0.22/0.80  
% 0.22/0.80  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.80  
% 0.22/0.80  
% 0.22/0.80  % Terminating...
% 1.01/0.86  % Runner terminated.
% 1.66/0.87  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------