TSTP Solution File: SET025-9 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET025-9 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:06:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 28.03s 28.27s
% Output   : Refutation 28.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   39 (   6 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(a2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,Y)
    | little_set(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',a2) ).

cnf(non_ordered_pair4,axiom,
    little_set(non_ordered_pair(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',non_ordered_pair4) ).

cnf(ordered_pair,axiom,
    ordered_pair(X,Y) = non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(X),non_ordered_pair(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',ordered_pair) ).

cnf(ordered_pair_predicate1,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X)
    | little_set(f2(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',ordered_pair_predicate1) ).

cnf(ordered_pair_predicate2,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X)
    | little_set(f3(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',ordered_pair_predicate2) ).

cnf(ordered_pair_predicate3,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X)
    | X = ordered_pair(f2(X),f3(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',ordered_pair_predicate3) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X)
    | X = non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(f2(X)),non_ordered_pair(f2(X),f3(X))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[ordered_pair_predicate3,ordered_pair,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(universal_set,axiom,
    ( member(X,universal_set)
    | ~ little_set(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',universal_set) ).

cnf(infinity1,axiom,
    little_set(infinity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',infinity1) ).

cnf(compose7,axiom,
    ( member(X,compose(Y,Z))
    | ~ little_set(X)
    | ~ little_set(U)
    | ~ little_set(V)
    | ~ little_set(W)
    | X != ordered_pair(U,V)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(U,W),Y)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(W,V),Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET003-0.ax',compose7) ).

cnf(158,plain,
    ( member(X,compose(Y,Z))
    | ~ little_set(X)
    | ~ little_set(U)
    | ~ little_set(V)
    | ~ little_set(W)
    | X != non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(U),non_ordered_pair(U,V))
    | ~ member(non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(U),non_ordered_pair(U,W)),Y)
    | ~ member(non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(W),non_ordered_pair(W,V)),Z) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[compose7,ordered_pair,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(an_ordered_pair_predicate,hypothesis,
    ordered_pair_predicate(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',an_ordered_pair_predicate) ).

cnf(prove_predicate_is_small,negated_conjecture,
    ~ little_set(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_predicate_is_small) ).

cnf(173,plain,
    ~ member(a,X),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[a2,prove_predicate_is_small]) ).

cnf(175,plain,
    member(non_ordered_pair(X,Y),universal_set),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[universal_set,non_ordered_pair4]) ).

cnf(179,plain,
    little_set(f2(a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ordered_pair_predicate1,an_ordered_pair_predicate]) ).

cnf(180,plain,
    little_set(f3(a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ordered_pair_predicate2,an_ordered_pair_predicate]) ).

cnf(557,plain,
    a = non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(f2(a)),non_ordered_pair(f2(a),f3(a))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[14,an_ordered_pair_predicate]) ).

cnf(3563,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[158,175,non_ordered_pair4,179,180,infinity1,175,theory(equality)]),173,557,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SET025-9 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 17:11:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  "."
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T17:11:20
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n014.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T17:11:20
% 28.03/28.27  
% 28.03/28.27  
% 28.03/28.27  #||
% 28.03/28.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 28.03/28.27  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 28.03/28.28  ||#
% 28.03/28.28  
% 28.03/28.28  ; Summary of computation:
% 28.03/28.28  ;     31905 formulas have been input or derived (from 187 formulas).
% 28.03/28.28  ;      3563 (11%) were retained.  Of these,
% 28.03/28.28  ;           61 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 28.03/28.28  ;         3502 (98%) are still being kept.
% 28.03/28.28  ; 
% 28.03/28.28  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.026   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.005   0%   Assert                       (143 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.374   1%   Process new row              (18,336 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    25.945  93%   Resolution                   (372 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.005   0%   Paramodulation               (186 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (13 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.098   0%   Condensing                   (14,163 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.831   3%   Forward subsumption          (14,163 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.098   0%   Backward subsumption         (3,093 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.054   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (17,084 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.243   1%   Forward simplification       (16,666 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.013   0%   Backward simplification      (3,537 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.011   0%   Ordering                     (8,122 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 28.03/28.28  ;     0.092   0%   Other
% 28.03/28.28  ;    27.795        Total
% 28.03/28.28  ;    27.801        Real time
% 28.03/28.28  ; 
% 28.03/28.28  ; Term-hash-array has 6,107 terms in all.
% 28.03/28.28  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,090 entries (3,090 at peak, 3,093 added, 3 deleted).
% 28.03/28.28  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 21,547 nodes (21,547 at peak, 21,555 added, 8 deleted).
% 28.03/28.28  ;  Retrieved 24,184 possibly forward subsuming rows in 14,163 calls.
% 28.03/28.28  ;  Retrieved 880 possibly backward subsumed rows in 3,093 calls.
% 28.03/28.28  ; Path-index has 6,076 entries (6,076 at peak, 6,114 added, 38 deleted).
% 28.03/28.28  ; Path-index has 16,181 nodes (16,181 at peak, 16,220 added, 39 deleted).
% 28.03/28.28  ; Trie-index has 6,076 entries (6,076 at peak, 6,114 added, 38 deleted).
% 28.03/28.28  ; Trie-index has 30,351 nodes (30,351 at peak, 30,398 added, 47 deleted).
% 28.03/28.28  ; Retrieved 20,871 generalization terms in 43,335 calls.
% 28.03/28.28  ; Retrieved 446 instance terms in 443 calls.
% 28.03/28.28  ; Retrieved 44,237,399 unifiable terms in 410,484 calls.
% 28.03/28.28  ; 
% 28.03/28.28  ; The agenda of rows to process has 7954 entries:
% 28.03/28.28  ;   142 with value 19            924 with value 27             193 with value 34
% 28.03/28.28  ;   926 with value 20           1388 with value 28              72 with value 35
% 28.03/28.28  ;   212 with value 21            678 with value 29              48 with value 36
% 28.03/28.28  ;   140 with value 22            640 with value 30              24 with value 38
% 28.03/28.28  ;   298 with value 23            203 with value 31              18 with value 39
% 28.03/28.28  ;   320 with value 24            202 with value 32              16 with value 40
% 28.03/28.28  ;   526 with value 25            164 with value 33               2 with value 44
% 28.03/28.28  ;   818 with value 26
% 28.03/28.28  ; The agenda of rows to give has 3321 entries:
% 28.03/28.28  ;     1 with value (4 7)         100 with value (4 26)          38 with value (4 45)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    35 with value (4 8)         195 with value (4 27)          35 with value (4 46)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    42 with value (4 9)         206 with value (4 28)          19 with value (4 47)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    30 with value (4 10)        177 with value (4 29)           2 with value (4 48)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    42 with value (4 11)        115 with value (4 30)          12 with value (4 49)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    28 with value (4 12)        111 with value (4 31)           6 with value (4 50)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    45 with value (4 13)         97 with value (4 32)           2 with value (4 51)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    89 with value (4 14)         91 with value (4 33)           8 with value (4 53)
% 28.03/28.28  ;   102 with value (4 15)         75 with value (4 34)           9 with value (4 56)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    77 with value (4 16)        149 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 57)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    90 with value (4 17)        176 with value (4 36)           2 with value (4 58)
% 28.03/28.28  ;   107 with value (4 18)        132 with value (4 37)           2 with value (4 59)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    84 with value (4 19)        136 with value (4 38)           9 with value (4 61)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    27 with value (4 20)         46 with value (4 39)           4 with value (4 62)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    58 with value (4 21)         56 with value (4 40)           4 with value (4 65)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    60 with value (4 22)         82 with value (4 41)           4 with value (4 74)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    58 with value (4 23)         69 with value (4 42)           2 with value (4 88)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    60 with value (4 24)         39 with value (4 43)           4 with value (4 94)
% 28.03/28.28  ;    48 with value (4 25)         18 with value (4 44)           4 with value (4 105)
% 28.03/28.28  Evaluation took:
% 28.03/28.28    27.804 seconds of real time
% 28.03/28.28    27.510176 seconds of user run time
% 28.03/28.28    0.288918 seconds of system run time
% 28.03/28.28    [Run times include 0.725 seconds GC run time.]
% 28.03/28.28    0 calls to %EVAL
% 28.03/28.28    0 page faults and
% 28.03/28.28    1,073,304,456 bytes consed.
% 28.03/28.28  :PROOF-FOUND
% 28.03/28.28  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T17:11:48
% 28.03/28.28  :PROOF-FOUND
% 28.03/28.28  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------