TSTP Solution File: SET025-9 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SET025-9 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:18:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.39s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 8 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ordered_pair,axiom,
ordered_pair(X1,X2) = non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(X1),non_ordered_pair(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XqT9DM08dD/E---3.1_29342.p',ordered_pair) ).
cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
singleton_set(X1) = non_ordered_pair(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XqT9DM08dD/E---3.1_29342.p',singleton_set) ).
cnf(ordered_pair_predicate3,axiom,
( X1 = ordered_pair(f2(X1),f3(X1))
| ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XqT9DM08dD/E---3.1_29342.p',ordered_pair_predicate3) ).
cnf(non_ordered_pair4,axiom,
little_set(non_ordered_pair(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XqT9DM08dD/E---3.1_29342.p',non_ordered_pair4) ).
cnf(an_ordered_pair_predicate,hypothesis,
ordered_pair_predicate(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XqT9DM08dD/E---3.1_29342.p',an_ordered_pair_predicate) ).
cnf(prove_predicate_is_small,negated_conjecture,
~ little_set(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XqT9DM08dD/E---3.1_29342.p',prove_predicate_is_small) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
ordered_pair(X1,X2) = non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(X1),non_ordered_pair(X1,X2)),
ordered_pair ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
singleton_set(X1) = non_ordered_pair(X1,X1),
singleton_set ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( X1 = ordered_pair(f2(X1),f3(X1))
| ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
ordered_pair_predicate3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
ordered_pair(X1,X2) = non_ordered_pair(non_ordered_pair(X1,X1),non_ordered_pair(X1,X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
little_set(non_ordered_pair(X1,X2)),
non_ordered_pair4 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = non_ordered_pair(non_ordered_pair(f2(X1),f2(X1)),non_ordered_pair(f2(X1),f3(X1)))
| ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( little_set(X1)
| ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
ordered_pair_predicate(a),
an_ordered_pair_predicate ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ little_set(a),
prove_predicate_is_small ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14 % Problem : SET025-9 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 17:17:29 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XqT9DM08dD/E---3.1_29342.p
% 0.39/0.60 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.39/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 29466 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.39/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.39/0.60 # Search class: FGHSF-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.60 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 664s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 216s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2i with 136s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S021I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 29474 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.39/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.39/0.60 # Search class: FGHSF-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.60 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 664s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.39/0.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.39/0.60
% 0.39/0.60 # Proof found!
% 0.39/0.60 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.39/0.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.60 # Parsed axioms : 143
% 0.39/0.60 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Initial clauses : 143
% 0.39/0.60 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.39/0.60 # Initial clauses in saturation : 137
% 0.39/0.60 # Processed clauses : 299
% 0.39/0.60 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.39/0.60 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.39/0.60 # ...remaining for further processing : 297
% 0.39/0.60 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 14
% 0.39/0.60 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Generated clauses : 747
% 0.39/0.60 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 729
% 0.39/0.60 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Paramodulations : 731
% 0.39/0.60 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.39/0.60 # NegExts : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Equation resolutions : 14
% 0.39/0.60 # Total rewrite steps : 44
% 0.39/0.60 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.60 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.60 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.60 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.60 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.60 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.39/0.60 # Current number of processed clauses : 146
% 0.39/0.60 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.39/0.60 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.39/0.60 # Non-unit-clauses : 131
% 0.39/0.60 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 704
% 0.39/0.60 # ...number of literals in the above : 1829
% 0.39/0.60 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Current number of archived clauses : 143
% 0.39/0.60 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9488
% 0.39/0.60 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4429
% 0.39/0.60 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 140
% 0.39/0.60 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.39/0.60 # Termbank termtop insertions : 17465
% 0.39/0.60
% 0.39/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.60 # User time : 0.033 s
% 0.39/0.60 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.39/0.60 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.39/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 2088 pages
% 0.39/0.60
% 0.39/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.60 # User time : 0.146 s
% 0.39/0.60 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.39/0.60 # Total time : 0.166 s
% 0.39/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
% 0.39/0.60 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.39/0.60 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------