TSTP Solution File: SET024+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET024+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:08:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.21s 2.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 2 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_88,plain,
( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
| X1 != X3
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hpuji8g5/lgb.p',i_0_88) ).
cnf(i_0_68,negated_conjecture,
~ member(esk6_0,unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk6_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hpuji8g5/lgb.p',i_0_68) ).
cnf(i_0_69,negated_conjecture,
member(esk6_0,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hpuji8g5/lgb.p',i_0_69) ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
| X1 != X3
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
i_0_88 ).
cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
~ member(esk6_0,unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk6_0)),
i_0_68 ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1))
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_92]) ).
cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
member(esk6_0,universal_class),
i_0_69 ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]),c_0_95])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET024+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 08:54:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.21/2.54 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.21/2.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.21/2.54 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.21/2.54 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.21/2.54 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.21/2.54 #
% 8.21/2.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 8.21/2.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.21/2.54
% 8.21/2.54 # Proof found!
% 8.21/2.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.21/2.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.21/2.54 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.21/2.54
% 8.21/2.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.21/2.54 # User time : 0.011 s
% 8.21/2.54 # System time : 0.007 s
% 8.21/2.54 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 8.21/2.54 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.21/2.54
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------