TSTP Solution File: SET024+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SET024+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:47:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 1.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 13 ~; 11 |; 5 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 5 sgn 13 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(set_in_its_singleton,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( member(X1,universal_class)
=> member(X1,singleton(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',set_in_its_singleton) ).
fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
! [X1] : singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',singleton_set_defn) ).
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
! [X3,X1,X2] :
( member(X3,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,universal_class)
& ( X3 = X1
| X3 = X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',unordered_pair_defn) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( member(X1,universal_class)
=> member(X1,singleton(X1)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[set_in_its_singleton]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( member(esk8_0,universal_class)
& ~ member(esk8_0,singleton(esk8_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X2] : singleton(X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5,X6] :
( ( member(X4,universal_class)
| ~ member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
& ( X4 = X5
| X4 = X6
| ~ member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
& ( X4 != X5
| ~ member(X4,universal_class)
| member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
& ( X4 != X6
| ~ member(X4,universal_class)
| member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ member(esk8_0,singleton(esk8_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| X1 != X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ member(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk8_0,esk8_0)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1))
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
member(esk8_0,universal_class),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SET024+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 09:08:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.21/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/1.40
% 0.21/1.40 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.21/1.40 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.21/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.21/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43
% 0.21/1.40 # Initial clauses : 2
% 0.21/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.21/1.40 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.21/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.21/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.21/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 547
% 0.21/1.40
% 0.21/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.40 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/1.40 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/1.40 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 2716 pages
% 0.21/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.21/1.40
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof found!
% 0.21/1.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/1.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.21/1.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.21/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.21/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Initial clauses : 91
% 0.21/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 0.21/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 83
% 0.21/1.40 # Processed clauses : 91
% 0.21/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 91
% 0.21/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.21/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.21/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.21/1.40 # Generated clauses : 236
% 0.21/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 203
% 0.21/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Paramodulations : 229
% 0.21/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 82
% 0.21/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.21/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 66
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 170
% 0.21/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 468
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.21/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 724
% 0.21/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 654
% 0.21/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.21/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71
% 0.21/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 16
% 0.21/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10780
% 0.21/1.40
% 0.21/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.40 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.21/1.40 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/1.40 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.21/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 3368 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------