TSTP Solution File: SET023-3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET023-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:21:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (  12 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ordered_pair,axiom,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(X1),non_ordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vXJUuLvHAE/E---3.1_9351.p',ordered_pair) ).

cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
    singleton_set(X1) = non_ordered_pair(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vXJUuLvHAE/E---3.1_9351.p',singleton_set) ).

cnf(property_of_second,axiom,
    ( second(ordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X2
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | ~ little_set(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vXJUuLvHAE/E---3.1_9351.p',property_of_second) ).

cnf(ordered_pair_predicate3,axiom,
    ( X1 = ordered_pair(f2(X1),f3(X1))
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vXJUuLvHAE/E---3.1_9351.p',ordered_pair_predicate3) ).

cnf(ordered_pair_predicate1,axiom,
    ( little_set(f2(X1))
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vXJUuLvHAE/E---3.1_9351.p',ordered_pair_predicate1) ).

cnf(ordered_pair_predicate2,axiom,
    ( little_set(f3(X1))
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vXJUuLvHAE/E---3.1_9351.p',ordered_pair_predicate2) ).

cnf(prove_second_component_is_small,negated_conjecture,
    ~ little_set(second(a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vXJUuLvHAE/E---3.1_9351.p',prove_second_component_is_small) ).

cnf(an_ordered_pair_predicate,hypothesis,
    ordered_pair_predicate(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vXJUuLvHAE/E---3.1_9351.p',an_ordered_pair_predicate) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = non_ordered_pair(singleton_set(X1),non_ordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    ordered_pair ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    singleton_set(X1) = non_ordered_pair(X1,X1),
    singleton_set ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( second(ordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X2
    | ~ little_set(X1)
    | ~ little_set(X2) ),
    property_of_second ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = non_ordered_pair(non_ordered_pair(X1,X1),non_ordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( X1 = ordered_pair(f2(X1),f3(X1))
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    ordered_pair_predicate3 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( second(non_ordered_pair(non_ordered_pair(X1,X1),non_ordered_pair(X1,X2))) = X2
    | ~ little_set(X2)
    | ~ little_set(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = non_ordered_pair(non_ordered_pair(f2(X1),f2(X1)),non_ordered_pair(f2(X1),f3(X1)))
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( little_set(f2(X1))
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    ordered_pair_predicate1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    ( little_set(f3(X1))
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    ordered_pair_predicate2 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( f3(X1) = second(X1)
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ little_set(second(a)),
    prove_second_component_is_small ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( little_set(second(X1))
    | ~ ordered_pair_predicate(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    ordered_pair_predicate(a),
    an_ordered_pair_predicate ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : SET023-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:34:04 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vXJUuLvHAE/E---3.1_9351.p
% 0.21/0.57  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.57  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.57  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 9475 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.21/0.57  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.57  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.57  # Search class: FGHSF-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.57  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.57  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 664s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting new_bool_3 with 216s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2i with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S021I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 9483 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.57  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.57  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.57  # Search class: FGHSF-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.57  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.57  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.57  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 664s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.57  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.57  
% 0.21/0.57  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.57  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.57  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.57  # Parsed axioms                        : 150
% 0.21/0.57  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Initial clauses                      : 150
% 0.21/0.57  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 0.21/0.57  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 144
% 0.21/0.57  # Processed clauses                    : 230
% 0.21/0.57  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.21/0.57  # ...subsumed                          : 11
% 0.21/0.57  # ...remaining for further processing  : 218
% 0.21/0.57  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 23
% 0.21/0.57  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.21/0.57  # Generated clauses                    : 1261
% 0.21/0.57  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1184
% 0.21/0.57  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.21/0.57  # Paramodulations                      : 1221
% 0.21/0.57  # Factorizations                       : 10
% 0.21/0.57  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Equation resolutions                 : 30
% 0.21/0.57  # Total rewrite steps                  : 256
% 0.21/0.57  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.57  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.57  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.57  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.57  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.57  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.57  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.57  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.57  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.57  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.57  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.57  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.57  # Current number of processed clauses  : 210
% 0.21/0.57  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 28
% 0.21/0.57  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.57  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.21/0.57  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 176
% 0.21/0.57  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1063
% 0.21/0.57  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3852
% 0.21/0.57  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Current number of archived clauses   : 11
% 0.21/0.57  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4929
% 0.21/0.57  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2226
% 0.21/0.57  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.21/0.57  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 939
% 0.21/0.57  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.57  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 0.21/0.57  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.21/0.57  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.57  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 22930
% 0.21/0.57  
% 0.21/0.57  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  # User time                : 0.052 s
% 0.21/0.57  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.57  # Total time               : 0.056 s
% 0.21/0.57  # Maximum resident set size: 2108 pages
% 0.21/0.57  
% 0.21/0.57  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  # User time                : 0.245 s
% 0.21/0.57  # System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.21/0.57  # Total time               : 0.263 s
% 0.21/0.57  # Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
% 0.21/0.57  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------