TSTP Solution File: SET020+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET020+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:08:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.40s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 14 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_30,plain,
( first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)))) = X1
| ~ member(X2,universal_class)
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_h2b961/lgb.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(i_0_87,negated_conjecture,
member(esk9_0,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_h2b961/lgb.p',i_0_87) ).
cnf(i_0_88,negated_conjecture,
member(esk8_0,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_h2b961/lgb.p',i_0_88) ).
cnf(i_0_86,negated_conjecture,
unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_0,esk8_0),unordered_pair(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0))) = esk10_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_h2b961/lgb.p',i_0_86) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
( second(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)))) = X2
| ~ member(X2,universal_class)
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_h2b961/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_85,negated_conjecture,
( first(esk10_0) != esk8_0
| second(esk10_0) != esk9_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_h2b961/lgb.p',i_0_85) ).
cnf(c_0_95,plain,
( first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)))) = X1
| ~ member(X2,universal_class)
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
member(esk9_0,universal_class),
i_0_87 ).
cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
( first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)))) = X1
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]) ).
cnf(c_0_98,negated_conjecture,
member(esk8_0,universal_class),
i_0_88 ).
cnf(c_0_99,negated_conjecture,
unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_0,esk8_0),unordered_pair(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0))) = esk10_0,
i_0_86 ).
cnf(c_0_100,plain,
( second(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)))) = X2
| ~ member(X2,universal_class)
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
( first(esk10_0) != esk8_0
| second(esk10_0) != esk9_0 ),
i_0_85 ).
cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
first(esk10_0) = esk8_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_98]),c_0_99]) ).
cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
( second(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)))) = esk9_0
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_96]) ).
cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
second(esk10_0) != esk9_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_102])]) ).
cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_98]),c_0_99]),c_0_104]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET020+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 01:43:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.40/2.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.40/2.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.40/2.44 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.40/2.44 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 8.40/2.44 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 8.40/2.44 #
% 8.40/2.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 8.40/2.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.40/2.44
% 8.40/2.44 # Proof found!
% 8.40/2.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.40/2.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.40/2.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.40/2.44
% 8.40/2.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.40/2.44 # User time : 0.019 s
% 8.40/2.44 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.40/2.44 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 8.40/2.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.40/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------