TSTP Solution File: SET018-7 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET018-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:05:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.84s 2.07s
% Output   : Refutation 1.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   16 (  12 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ordered_pair,axiom,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X),unordered_pair(X,singleton(Y))) = ordered_pair(X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',ordered_pair) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X),complement(Y))) = union(X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).

cnf(unordered_pairs_and_singletons,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X,Y) = union(singleton(X),singleton(Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unordered_pairs_and_singletons) ).

cnf(148,plain,
    unordered_pair(X,Y) = complement(intersection(complement(singleton(X)),complement(singleton(Y)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[unordered_pairs_and_singletons,union,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(ordered_pair_determines_components2,axiom,
    ( ordered_pair(X,Y) != ordered_pair(Z,U)
    | ~ member(Y,universal_class)
    | Y = U ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ordered_pair_determines_components2) ).

cnf(prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_1,negated_conjecture,
    ordered_pair(w,x) = ordered_pair(y,z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_1) ).

cnf(prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_2,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_2) ).

cnf(prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_3,negated_conjecture,
    x != z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_3) ).

cnf(177,plain,
    complement(intersection(complement(singleton(singleton(X))),complement(singleton(complement(intersection(complement(singleton(X)),complement(singleton(singleton(Y))))))))) = ordered_pair(X,Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[ordered_pair,148,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(209,plain,
    ( complement(intersection(complement(singleton(singleton(X))),complement(singleton(complement(intersection(complement(singleton(X)),complement(singleton(singleton(Y))))))))) != complement(intersection(complement(singleton(singleton(Z))),complement(singleton(complement(intersection(complement(singleton(Z)),complement(singleton(singleton(U)))))))))
    | ~ member(Y,universal_class)
    | Y = U ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[ordered_pair_determines_components2,177,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(215,plain,
    complement(intersection(complement(singleton(singleton(w))),complement(singleton(complement(intersection(complement(singleton(w)),complement(singleton(singleton(x))))))))) = complement(intersection(complement(singleton(singleton(y))),complement(singleton(complement(intersection(complement(singleton(y)),complement(singleton(singleton(z))))))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_1,177,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1980,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[209,215,prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_2,prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SET018-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 12:43:35 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.48  * 
% 0.22/0.48  * 
% 0.22/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  "."
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T12:43:36
% 0.22/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n006.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T12:43:36
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 1.84/2.07  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 1.84/2.07  
% 1.84/2.07  #||
% 1.84/2.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/2.07  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.84/2.07  ||#
% 1.84/2.07  
% 1.84/2.07  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.84/2.07  ;      4156 formulas have been input or derived (from 143 formulas).
% 1.84/2.07  ;      1980 (48%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.84/2.07  ;          132 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.84/2.07  ;         1848 (93%) are still being kept.
% 1.84/2.07  ; 
% 1.84/2.07  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.84/2.07  ;     0.032   2%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.84/2.07  ;     0.002   0%   Assert                       (170 calls)
% 1.84/2.07  ;     0.314  20%   Process new row              (3,812 calls)
% 1.84/2.07  ;     0.107   7%   Resolution                   (284 calls)
% 1.84/2.07  ;     0.018   1%   Paramodulation               (142 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (23 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.038   2%   Condensing                   (2,247 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.585  37%   Forward subsumption          (2,247 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.120   8%   Backward subsumption         (1,709 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.049   3%   Clause clause subsumption    (17,654 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.241  15%   Forward simplification       (3,811 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.012   1%   Backward simplification      (1,963 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.016   1%   Ordering                     (8,177 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     0.041   3%   Other
% 1.93/2.08  ;     1.575        Total
% 1.93/2.08  ;     1.585        Real time
% 1.93/2.08  ; 
% 1.93/2.08  ; Term-hash-array has 4,965 terms in all.
% 1.93/2.08  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,612 entries (1,652 at peak, 1,709 added, 97 deleted).
% 1.93/2.08  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 15,079 nodes (15,459 at peak, 15,789 added, 710 deleted).
% 1.93/2.08  ;  Retrieved 28,556 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,247 calls.
% 1.93/2.08  ;  Retrieved 2,710 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,709 calls.
% 1.93/2.08  ; Path-index has 4,793 entries (4,878 at peak, 5,032 added, 239 deleted).
% 1.93/2.08  ; Path-index has 11,233 nodes (11,338 at peak, 11,543 added, 310 deleted).
% 1.93/2.08  ; Trie-index has 4,793 entries (4,878 at peak, 5,032 added, 239 deleted).
% 1.93/2.08  ; Trie-index has 22,969 nodes (24,191 at peak, 24,638 added, 1,669 deleted).
% 1.93/2.08  ; Retrieved 27,798 generalization terms in 49,666 calls.
% 1.93/2.08  ; Retrieved 402 instance terms in 253 calls.
% 1.93/2.08  ; Retrieved 72,768 unifiable terms in 1,969 calls.
% 1.93/2.08  ; 
% 1.93/2.08  ; The agenda of rows to process has 130 entries:
% 1.93/2.08  ;    10 with value 5               6 with value 52               2 with value 112
% 1.93/2.08  ;     1 with value 8               2 with value 54               4 with value 114
% 1.93/2.08  ;     3 with value 11              2 with value 58               2 with value 115
% 1.93/2.08  ;     1 with value 12              2 with value 61               2 with value 122
% 1.93/2.08  ;     3 with value 14              2 with value 63               2 with value 123
% 1.93/2.08  ;     5 with value 21              6 with value 79               4 with value 125
% 1.93/2.08  ;     1 with value 23              4 with value 85               4 with value 126
% 1.93/2.08  ;     6 with value 24              2 with value 89               2 with value 134
% 1.93/2.08  ;     3 with value 27              4 with value 91               2 with value 141
% 1.93/2.08  ;     1 with value 39              2 with value 93               2 with value 145
% 1.93/2.08  ;     6 with value 40              2 with value 95               2 with value 150
% 1.93/2.08  ;     3 with value 46              4 with value 98               2 with value 157
% 1.93/2.08  ;     4 with value 48              4 with value 100              4 with value 203
% 1.93/2.08  ;     5 with value 49              2 with value 101
% 1.93/2.08  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 14 entries:
% 1.93/2.08  ;     1 with value 56              1 with value 66               1 with value 123
% 1.93/2.08  ;     1 with value 57              1 with value 74               2 with value 139
% 1.93/2.08  ;     2 with value 62              2 with value 94               2 with value 212
% 1.93/2.08  ;     1 with value 64
% 1.93/2.08  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1692 entries:
% 1.93/2.08  ;     2 with value (4 4)           9 with value (4 45)          10 with value (4 85)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     2 with value (4 5)          31 with value (4 46)          17 with value (4 86)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    23 with value (4 7)          18 with value (4 47)          30 with value (4 87)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    13 with value (4 8)          28 with value (4 48)          10 with value (4 88)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    11 with value (4 9)          19 with value (4 49)           8 with value (4 89)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     8 with value (4 10)         20 with value (4 50)          16 with value (4 90)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    13 with value (4 11)         26 with value (4 51)           3 with value (4 91)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    11 with value (4 12)         23 with value (4 52)           4 with value (4 92)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    18 with value (4 13)         15 with value (4 53)          13 with value (4 93)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    17 with value (4 14)         31 with value (4 54)          10 with value (4 94)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    22 with value (4 15)         16 with value (4 55)           8 with value (4 95)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    18 with value (4 16)         19 with value (4 56)          10 with value (4 96)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    22 with value (4 17)         18 with value (4 57)          12 with value (4 98)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    25 with value (4 18)         17 with value (4 58)           3 with value (4 99)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    28 with value (4 19)         37 with value (4 59)           4 with value (4 100)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    25 with value (4 20)         13 with value (4 60)           6 with value (4 101)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    21 with value (4 21)         12 with value (4 61)           5 with value (4 102)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    13 with value (4 22)         20 with value (4 62)           4 with value (4 103)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    24 with value (4 23)         12 with value (4 63)           8 with value (4 104)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    22 with value (4 24)         18 with value (4 64)           3 with value (4 105)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    16 with value (4 25)         16 with value (4 65)           8 with value (4 106)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    15 with value (4 26)         13 with value (4 66)           5 with value (4 108)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    21 with value (4 27)         23 with value (4 67)           4 with value (4 109)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    14 with value (4 28)         17 with value (4 68)          10 with value (4 111)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    12 with value (4 29)         22 with value (4 69)           3 with value (4 112)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    16 with value (4 30)         13 with value (4 70)           3 with value (4 113)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    21 with value (4 31)         15 with value (4 71)          10 with value (4 114)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    17 with value (4 32)          9 with value (4 72)           7 with value (4 115)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    15 with value (4 33)         14 with value (4 73)           8 with value (4 116)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    19 with value (4 34)         11 with value (4 74)           2 with value (4 118)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    14 with value (4 35)         18 with value (4 75)           1 with value (4 120)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    17 with value (4 36)         17 with value (4 76)           8 with value (4 122)
% 1.93/2.08  ;     6 with value (4 37)         19 with value (4 77)           4 with value (4 123)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    20 with value (4 38)         21 with value (4 78)           6 with value (4 126)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    15 with value (4 39)         19 with value (4 79)           2 with value (4 127)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    44 with value (4 40)          9 with value (4 80)           2 with value (4 129)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    18 with value (4 41)         10 with value (4 81)           2 with value (4 131)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    26 with value (4 42)          8 with value (4 82)           4 with value (4 134)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    32 with value (4 43)         10 with value (4 83)           2 with value (4 144)
% 1.93/2.08  ;    22 with value (4 44)         13 with value (4 84)
% 1.93/2.08  Evaluation took:
% 1.93/2.08    1.587 seconds of real time
% 1.93/2.08    1.484529 seconds of user run time
% 1.93/2.08    0.102928 seconds of system run time
% 1.93/2.08    [Run times include 0.162 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.93/2.08    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.93/2.08    0 page faults and
% 1.93/2.08    163,774,832 bytes consed.
% 1.93/2.08  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.93/2.08  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T12:43:37
% 1.93/2.08  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.93/2.08  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------