TSTP Solution File: SET015+4 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SET015+4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 22:51:16 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 2.63s
% Output   : Solution 2.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14640/SET015+4.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14640/SET015+4.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14640/SET015+4.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 14736
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.015 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(member(X1,union(X2,X3))<=>(member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', union)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X2]:![X3]:(equal_set(X2,X3)<=>(subset(X2,X3)&subset(X3,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', equal_set)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X2]:![X3]:(subset(X2,X3)<=>![X1]:(member(X1,X2)=>member(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', subset)).
% fof(12, conjecture,![X2]:![X3]:equal_set(union(X2,X3),union(X3,X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', thI07)).
% fof(13, negated_conjecture,~(![X2]:![X3]:equal_set(union(X2,X3),union(X3,X2))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[12])).
% fof(16, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(member(X1,union(X2,X3)))|(member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3)))&((~(member(X1,X2))&~(member(X1,X3)))|member(X1,union(X2,X3)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(17, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((~(member(X4,union(X5,X6)))|(member(X4,X5)|member(X4,X6)))&((~(member(X4,X5))&~(member(X4,X6)))|member(X4,union(X5,X6)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[16])).
% fof(18, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((~(member(X4,union(X5,X6)))|(member(X4,X5)|member(X4,X6)))&((~(member(X4,X5))|member(X4,union(X5,X6)))&(~(member(X4,X6))|member(X4,union(X5,X6))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[17])).
% cnf(19,plain,(member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% cnf(20,plain,(member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% cnf(21,plain,(member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,union(X3,X2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(22, plain,![X2]:![X3]:((~(equal_set(X2,X3))|(subset(X2,X3)&subset(X3,X2)))&((~(subset(X2,X3))|~(subset(X3,X2)))|equal_set(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(23, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(equal_set(X4,X5))|(subset(X4,X5)&subset(X5,X4)))&((~(subset(X4,X5))|~(subset(X5,X4)))|equal_set(X4,X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X4]:![X5]:(((subset(X4,X5)|~(equal_set(X4,X5)))&(subset(X5,X4)|~(equal_set(X4,X5))))&((~(subset(X4,X5))|~(subset(X5,X4)))|equal_set(X4,X5))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[23])).
% cnf(25,plain,(equal_set(X1,X2)|~subset(X2,X1)|~subset(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(28, plain,![X2]:![X3]:((~(subset(X2,X3))|![X1]:(~(member(X1,X2))|member(X1,X3)))&(?[X1]:(member(X1,X2)&~(member(X1,X3)))|subset(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(29, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5)))&(?[X7]:(member(X7,X4)&~(member(X7,X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[28])).
% fof(30, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[29])).
% fof(31, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[30])).
% fof(32, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)|subset(X4,X5))&(~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|subset(X4,X5)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[31])).
% cnf(33,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32])).
% cnf(34,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32])).
% fof(80, negated_conjecture,?[X2]:?[X3]:~(equal_set(union(X2,X3),union(X3,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[13])).
% fof(81, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:~(equal_set(union(X4,X5),union(X5,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[80])).
% fof(82, negated_conjecture,~(equal_set(union(esk4_0,esk5_0),union(esk5_0,esk4_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[81])).
% cnf(83,negated_conjecture,(~equal_set(union(esk4_0,esk5_0),union(esk5_0,esk4_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[82])).
% cnf(87,negated_conjecture,(~subset(union(esk5_0,esk4_0),union(esk4_0,esk5_0))|~subset(union(esk4_0,esk5_0),union(esk5_0,esk4_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[83,25,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(96,plain,(subset(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[33,19,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(97,plain,(subset(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[33,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(101,plain,(member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X1)|member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X2)|subset(union(X1,X2),X3)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[21,34,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(508,plain,(subset(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X1))|member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X1)),X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[96,101,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(26495,plain,(subset(union(X1,X2),union(X2,X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[97,508,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(26533,negated_conjecture,($false|~subset(union(esk4_0,esk5_0),union(esk5_0,esk4_0))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[87,26495,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(26534,negated_conjecture,($false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[26533,26495,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(26535,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[26534,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(26536,negated_conjecture,($false),26535,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 1580
% # ...of these trivial                : 71
% # ...subsumed                        : 49
% # ...remaining for further processing: 1460
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 13
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 33
% # Generated clauses                  : 24660
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 23107
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 24615
% # Factorizations                     : 32
% # Equation resolutions               : 13
% # Current number of processed clauses: 1394
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 1167
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 44
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 183
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15368
% # ...number of literals in the above : 32270
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1555
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1326
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 741
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 17833
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 34
% # Backwards rewriting index:   573 leaves,   4.66+/-7.852 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:          207 leaves,   6.05+/-10.906 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:          516 leaves,   4.94+/-8.117 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 1.179 s
% # System time            : 0.038 s
% # Total time             : 1.217 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 1.70 CPU 1.76 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 1.70 CPU 1.76 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14640/SET015+4.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------