TSTP Solution File: SET014+4 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SET014+4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 22:51:07 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.91s
% Output   : Solution 0.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17307/SET014+4.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17307/SET014+4.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17307/SET014+4.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 17403
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.015 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(member(X1,union(X2,X3))<=>(member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', union)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X2]:![X3]:(subset(X2,X3)<=>![X1]:(member(X1,X2)=>member(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', subset)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(member(X1,power_set(X2))<=>subset(X1,X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', power_set)).
% fof(12, conjecture,![X2]:![X1]:![X5]:((subset(X1,X2)&subset(X5,X2))<=>subset(union(X1,X5),X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', thI45)).
% fof(13, negated_conjecture,~(![X2]:![X1]:![X5]:((subset(X1,X2)&subset(X5,X2))<=>subset(union(X1,X5),X2))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[12])).
% fof(16, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(member(X1,union(X2,X3)))|(member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3)))&((~(member(X1,X2))&~(member(X1,X3)))|member(X1,union(X2,X3)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(17, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((~(member(X4,union(X5,X6)))|(member(X4,X5)|member(X4,X6)))&((~(member(X4,X5))&~(member(X4,X6)))|member(X4,union(X5,X6)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[16])).
% fof(18, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((~(member(X4,union(X5,X6)))|(member(X4,X5)|member(X4,X6)))&((~(member(X4,X5))|member(X4,union(X5,X6)))&(~(member(X4,X6))|member(X4,union(X5,X6))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[17])).
% cnf(19,plain,(member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% cnf(20,plain,(member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% cnf(21,plain,(member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,union(X3,X2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(22, plain,![X2]:![X3]:((~(subset(X2,X3))|![X1]:(~(member(X1,X2))|member(X1,X3)))&(?[X1]:(member(X1,X2)&~(member(X1,X3)))|subset(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(23, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5)))&(?[X7]:(member(X7,X4)&~(member(X7,X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[23])).
% fof(25, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(26, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)|subset(X4,X5))&(~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|subset(X4,X5)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[25])).
% cnf(27,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% cnf(28,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% cnf(29,plain,(member(X3,X2)|~subset(X1,X2)|~member(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% fof(36, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(member(X1,power_set(X2)))|subset(X1,X2))&(~(subset(X1,X2))|member(X1,power_set(X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(37, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(member(X3,power_set(X4)))|subset(X3,X4))&(~(subset(X3,X4))|member(X3,power_set(X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[36])).
% cnf(38,plain,(member(X1,power_set(X2))|~subset(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[37])).
% cnf(39,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|~member(X1,power_set(X2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[37])).
% fof(80, negated_conjecture,?[X2]:?[X1]:?[X5]:(((~(subset(X1,X2))|~(subset(X5,X2)))|~(subset(union(X1,X5),X2)))&((subset(X1,X2)&subset(X5,X2))|subset(union(X1,X5),X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[13])).
% fof(81, negated_conjecture,?[X6]:?[X7]:?[X8]:(((~(subset(X7,X6))|~(subset(X8,X6)))|~(subset(union(X7,X8),X6)))&((subset(X7,X6)&subset(X8,X6))|subset(union(X7,X8),X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[80])).
% fof(82, negated_conjecture,(((~(subset(esk5_0,esk4_0))|~(subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)))|~(subset(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0)))&((subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)&subset(esk6_0,esk4_0))|subset(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[81])).
% fof(83, negated_conjecture,(((~(subset(esk5_0,esk4_0))|~(subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)))|~(subset(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0)))&((subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|subset(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0))&(subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)|subset(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[82])).
% cnf(84,negated_conjecture,(subset(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0)|subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[83])).
% cnf(85,negated_conjecture,(subset(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0)|subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[83])).
% cnf(86,negated_conjecture,(~subset(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0)|~subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[83])).
% cnf(95,plain,(member(X1,power_set(X2))|member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[38,28,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(99,negated_conjecture,(member(esk1_2(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0),union(esk5_0,esk6_0))|~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|~subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[86,28,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(102,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|~subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)|~member(esk1_2(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0),esk4_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[86,27,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(103,plain,(member(X1,power_set(X2))|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[38,27,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(111,negated_conjecture,(member(X1,esk4_0)|subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|~member(X1,union(esk5_0,esk6_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[29,85,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(112,negated_conjecture,(member(X1,esk4_0)|subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)|~member(X1,union(esk5_0,esk6_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[29,84,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(177,negated_conjecture,(member(esk1_2(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0),esk5_0)|member(esk1_2(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0),esk6_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|~subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[21,99,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(183,negated_conjecture,(subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|member(X1,esk4_0)|~member(X1,esk5_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[111,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(207,negated_conjecture,(member(X1,esk4_0)|~member(X1,esk5_0)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[183,29])).
% cnf(210,negated_conjecture,(member(esk1_2(esk5_0,X1),esk4_0)|member(esk5_0,power_set(X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[207,95,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(215,negated_conjecture,(subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)|member(X1,esk4_0)|~member(X1,esk6_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[112,19,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(234,negated_conjecture,(member(X1,esk4_0)|~member(X1,esk6_0)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[215,29])).
% cnf(237,negated_conjecture,(member(esk1_2(esk6_0,X1),esk4_0)|member(esk6_0,power_set(X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[234,95,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(259,negated_conjecture,(member(esk5_0,power_set(esk4_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[103,210,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(281,negated_conjecture,(member(esk6_0,power_set(esk4_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[103,237,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(440,negated_conjecture,(member(esk1_2(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0),esk4_0)|member(esk1_2(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0),esk5_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|~subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[234,177,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(442,negated_conjecture,(member(esk1_2(union(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk4_0),esk4_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|~subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[440,29])).
% cnf(443,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|~subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[442,102])).
% cnf(446,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|~member(esk6_0,power_set(esk4_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[443,39,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(449,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[446,281,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(450,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk5_0,esk4_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[449,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(456,negated_conjecture,(~member(esk5_0,power_set(esk4_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[450,39,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(463,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[456,259,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(464,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[463,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(465,negated_conjecture,($false),464,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 161
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 9
% # ...remaining for further processing: 152
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 10
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 3
% # Generated clauses                  : 342
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 296
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 6
% # Paramodulations                    : 335
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 3
% # Current number of processed clauses: 100
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 38
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 6
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 56
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 139
% # ...number of literals in the above : 328
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 172
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 148
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 153
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 3
% # Backwards rewriting index:    96 leaves,   1.72+/-2.019 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           31 leaves,   1.77+/-2.720 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           82 leaves,   1.72+/-2.126 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.025 s
% # System time            : 0.006 s
% # Total time             : 0.031 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.20 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.20 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17307/SET014+4.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------