TSTP Solution File: SET014+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET014+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:14:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 10.36s 10.57s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET014+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 12:58:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.34 The process was started by sandbox2 on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.34 Sun Jul 10 12:58:47 2022
% 0.13/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23949.
% 0.13/0.34
% 0.13/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.34
% 0.13/0.34 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.34
% 0.13/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.34
% 0.13/0.34 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.34 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.34 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.34 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.34
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.34
% 0.13/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.34
% 0.13/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [copy,13,flip.1] {-} union(A,B)=union(B,A).
% 0.13/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.34 18 back subsumes 11.
% 0.13/0.34
% 0.13/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 10
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 58
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.19/0.38 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.19/0.38 distinct function count: 3
% 0.19/0.38 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Changing weight limit from 60 to 38.
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Model 4 [ 1 1 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Model 5 [ 2 1 109 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Model 6 [ 1 3 88717 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.06/1.24
% 1.06/1.24 Resetting weight limit to 38 after 65 givens.
% 1.06/1.24
% 4.22/4.39
% 4.22/4.39
% 4.22/4.39 Changing weight limit from 38 to 33.
% 4.22/4.39
% 4.22/4.39 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 95 givens.
% 4.22/4.39
% 5.78/5.99
% 5.78/5.99
% 5.78/5.99 Changing weight limit from 33 to 27.
% 5.78/5.99
% 5.78/5.99 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 100 givens.
% 5.78/5.99
% 6.67/6.88
% 6.67/6.88
% 6.67/6.88 Changing weight limit from 27 to 24.
% 6.67/6.88
% 6.67/6.88 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 105 givens.
% 6.67/6.88
% 7.28/7.51
% 7.28/7.51
% 7.28/7.51 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 7.28/7.51
% 7.28/7.51 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 115 givens.
% 7.28/7.51
% 7.90/8.11
% 7.90/8.11
% 7.90/8.11 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 7.90/8.11
% 7.90/8.11 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 120 givens.
% 7.90/8.11
% 9.03/9.23
% 9.03/9.23
% 9.03/9.23 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 9.03/9.23
% 9.03/9.23 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 140 givens.
% 9.03/9.23
% 10.36/10.56 member($f2($c3,union($c1,$c1)),union(union($c3,$c1),A)).
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 10.36/10.56 283 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 9037.2 K.
% 10.36/10.56 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 10.36/10.56 sym_ent ( 304) 120 0 120 0 35.6 K
% 10.36/10.56 term ( 32) 1483003 1458822 24181 9551 1054.1 K
% 10.36/10.56 rel ( 40) 1260724 1219246 41478 14092 2170.7 K
% 10.36/10.56 term_ptr ( 16) 960798 877651 83147 105090 2941.2 K
% 10.36/10.56 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 10.36/10.56 fpa_head ( 24) 2505 1775 730 314 24.5 K
% 10.36/10.56 fpa_tree ( 56) 105868 105868 0 135 7.4 K
% 10.36/10.56 context (1288) 219460 219460 0 5 6.3 K
% 10.36/10.56 trail ( 24) 3688071 3688071 0 9 0.2 K
% 10.36/10.56 imd_tree ( 32) 4 0 4 0 0.1 K
% 10.36/10.56 imd_pos (4024) 14625 14625 0 2 7.9 K
% 10.36/10.56 is_tree ( 24) 18246 15349 2897 2177 118.9 K
% 10.36/10.56 is_pos (2424) 4467678 4467678 0 8 18.9 K
% 10.36/10.56 fsub_pos ( 16) 229185 229185 0 1 0.0 K
% 10.36/10.56 literal ( 32) 222846 203321 19525 6652 818.0 K
% 10.36/10.56 clause ( 88) 63890 56579 7311 159 642.0 K
% 10.36/10.56 list ( 272) 17 10 7 2 2.4 K
% 10.36/10.56 clash_nd ( 80) 757 757 0 2 0.2 K
% 10.36/10.56 clause_ptr ( 16) 24463 17168 7295 159 116.5 K
% 10.36/10.56 int_ptr ( 16) 332189 269934 62255 1530 996.6 K
% 10.36/10.56 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 10.36/10.56 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 10.36/10.56 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 10.36/10.56 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 10.36/10.56 formula( 40) 99 99 0 50 2.0 K
% 10.36/10.56 formula_ptr( 16) 7 7 0 7 0.1 K
% 10.36/10.56 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 10.36/10.56 k subsume 0.00
% 10.36/10.56 factor time 0.00
% 10.36/10.56 FINDER time 0.00
% 10.36/10.56 unindex time 0.00
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56 true clauses given 52 (33.5%)
% 10.36/10.56 false clauses given 103
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56 FALSE TRUE
% 10.36/10.56 9 3 3
% 10.36/10.56 10 11 37
% 10.36/10.56 11 14 20
% 10.36/10.56 12 23 80
% 10.36/10.56 13 49 55
% 10.36/10.56 14 177 293
% 10.36/10.56 15 68 205
% 10.36/10.56 16 218 451
% 10.36/10.56 17 187 511
% 10.36/10.56 18 386 708
% 10.36/10.56 19 374 148
% 10.36/10.56 20 455 15
% 10.36/10.56 21 491 0
% 10.36/10.56 tot: 2456 2526 (50.7% true)
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56 Model 6 [ 1 3 88717 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 10.36/10.56 1:7 2:14 3:14 4:0 5:1 6:0 7:0 8:2 9:80 10:6
% 10.36/10.56 11:0 12:30 13:19 14:151 15:149 16:141 17:74 18:2245 19:39 20:21
% 10.36/10.56 21:34 22:31 23:34 24:47 25:25 26:83 27:36 28:38 29:30 30:142
% 10.36/10.56 31:71 32:43 33:43 34:1 35:26 36:26 37:143 38:37 39:54 40:44
% 10.36/10.56 41:63 42:0 43:96 44:87 45:17 46:95 47:57 48:53 49:11 50:11
% 10.36/10.56 51:134 52:17 53:176 54:73 55:12 56:6 57:2 58:2 59:2 60:1
% 10.36/10.56 61:1 62:0 63:8 64:3 65:8 66:9 67:3 68:0 69:6 70:0
% 10.36/10.56 71:7 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:4 76:0 77:1 78:1 79:0 80:7
% 10.36/10.56 81:72 82:73 83:1 84:1 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 10.36/10.56 91:0 92:0 93:29 94:39 95:0 96:0 97:29 98:0 99:0
% 10.36/10.56 All others: 9001.
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 10.36/10.56
% 10.36/10.56 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------