TSTP Solution File: SET012-3 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SET012-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:17:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 33.99s 4.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 33.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  11 unt;  11 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   58 (  16 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p',complement1) ).

cnf(extensionality2,axiom,
    ( member(f1(X1,X2),X1)
    | member(f1(X1,X2),X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p',extensionality2) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ little_set(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p',complement2) ).

cnf(extensionality1,axiom,
    ( little_set(f1(X1,X2))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p',extensionality1) ).

cnf(complement_of_a_is_b,hypothesis,
    complement(as) = bs,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p',complement_of_a_is_b) ).

cnf(complement_of_b_is_c,hypothesis,
    complement(bs) = cs,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p',complement_of_b_is_c) ).

cnf(prove_a_equals_c,negated_conjecture,
    as != cs,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p',prove_a_equals_c) ).

cnf(a2,axiom,
    ( little_set(X1)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p',a2) ).

cnf(extensionality3,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p',extensionality3) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    complement1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( member(f1(X1,X2),X1)
    | member(f1(X1,X2),X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    extensionality2 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ little_set(X1) ),
    complement2 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( little_set(f1(X1,X2))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    extensionality1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( complement(X1) = X2
    | member(f1(complement(X1),X2),X2)
    | ~ member(f1(complement(X1),X2),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | member(f1(X1,X2),complement(X3))
    | member(f1(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( complement(complement(X1)) = X2
    | member(f1(complement(complement(X1)),X2),X1)
    | member(f1(complement(complement(X1)),X2),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    complement(as) = bs,
    complement_of_a_is_b ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    complement(bs) = cs,
    complement_of_b_is_c ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    ( cs = X1
    | member(f1(cs,X1),as)
    | member(f1(cs,X1),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    as != cs,
    prove_a_equals_c ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    ( little_set(X1)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    a2 ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    member(f1(cs,as),as),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    ( ~ member(X1,bs)
    | ~ member(X1,as) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ member(f1(X1,X2),X2) ),
    extensionality3 ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    ( member(X1,bs)
    | member(X1,cs)
    | ~ little_set(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    little_set(f1(cs,as)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ~ member(f1(cs,as),bs),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    ~ member(f1(cs,as),cs),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.11  % Problem    : SET012-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:18:49 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nBWBfbVWrs/E---3.1_12958.p
% 33.99/4.91  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 33.99/4.91  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 33.99/4.91  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13036 completed with status 0
% 33.99/4.91  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 33.99/4.91  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 33.99/4.91  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # No SInE strategy applied
% 33.99/4.91  # Search class: FGHSF-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 33.99/4.91  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 33.99/4.91  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 664s (1) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting new_bool_3 with 216s (1) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2i with 136s (1) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S021I with 136s (1) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 13044 completed with status 0
% 33.99/4.91  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 33.99/4.91  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 33.99/4.91  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # No SInE strategy applied
% 33.99/4.91  # Search class: FGHSF-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 33.99/4.91  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 33.99/4.91  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 33.99/4.91  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 664s (1) cores
% 33.99/4.91  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 33.99/4.91  
% 33.99/4.91  # Proof found!
% 33.99/4.91  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 33.99/4.91  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 33.99/4.91  # Parsed axioms                        : 144
% 33.99/4.91  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 33.99/4.91  # Initial clauses                      : 144
% 33.99/4.91  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 33.99/4.91  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 138
% 33.99/4.91  # Processed clauses                    : 5985
% 33.99/4.91  # ...of these trivial                  : 333
% 33.99/4.91  # ...subsumed                          : 3023
% 33.99/4.91  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2629
% 33.99/4.91  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1618
% 33.99/4.91  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 33.99/4.91  # Backward-subsumed                    : 131
% 33.99/4.91  # Backward-rewritten                   : 88
% 33.99/4.91  # Generated clauses                    : 137409
% 33.99/4.91  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 125694
% 33.99/4.91  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 33.99/4.91  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 289
% 33.99/4.91  # Paramodulations                      : 134643
% 33.99/4.91  # Factorizations                       : 848
% 33.99/4.91  # NegExts                              : 0
% 33.99/4.91  # Equation resolutions                 : 1917
% 33.99/4.91  # Total rewrite steps                  : 41673
% 33.99/4.91  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 33.99/4.91  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 33.99/4.91  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 33.99/4.91  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 33.99/4.91  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 33.99/4.91  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 33.99/4.91  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 33.99/4.91  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 33.99/4.91  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 33.99/4.91  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 33.99/4.91  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 33.99/4.91  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 33.99/4.91  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2406
% 33.99/4.91  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 82
% 33.99/4.91  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 33.99/4.91  #    Negative unit clauses             : 39
% 33.99/4.91  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2285
% 33.99/4.91  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 119519
% 33.99/4.91  # ...number of literals in the above   : 512083
% 33.99/4.91  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 33.99/4.91  # Current number of archived clauses   : 226
% 33.99/4.91  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 760979
% 33.99/4.91  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 223279
% 33.99/4.91  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1781
% 33.99/4.91  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33105
% 33.99/4.91  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 33.99/4.91  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 46
% 33.99/4.91  # BW rewrite match successes           : 31
% 33.99/4.91  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 33.99/4.91  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 33.99/4.91  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3998327
% 33.99/4.91  
% 33.99/4.91  # -------------------------------------------------
% 33.99/4.91  # User time                : 3.899 s
% 33.99/4.91  # System time              : 0.130 s
% 33.99/4.91  # Total time               : 4.029 s
% 33.99/4.91  # Maximum resident set size: 2092 pages
% 33.99/4.91  
% 33.99/4.91  # -------------------------------------------------
% 33.99/4.91  # User time                : 20.769 s
% 33.99/4.91  # System time              : 0.635 s
% 33.99/4.91  # Total time               : 21.404 s
% 33.99/4.91  # Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
% 33.99/4.91  % E---3.1 exiting
% 33.99/4.91  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------