TSTP Solution File: SET012+4 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SET012+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:23:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 7.03s 1.73s
% Output   : Proof 8.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SET012+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 08:47:38 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.59  ________       _____
% 0.19/0.59  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.59  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.19/0.59  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.19/0.59  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.59  (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.59  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.59                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.59  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.60  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.62  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.08/1.06  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.08/1.06  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.86/1.11  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.86/1.11  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.86/1.11  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.86/1.11  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.86/1.11  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.95/1.47  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.95/1.47  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 5.54/1.47  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.54/1.48  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.54/1.49  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 5.73/1.52  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 5.95/1.53  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.03/1.73  Prover 3: proved (1116ms)
% 7.03/1.73  
% 7.03/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.03/1.73  
% 7.03/1.73  Prover 2: stopped
% 7.03/1.73  Prover 0: stopped
% 7.03/1.73  Prover 5: stopped
% 7.03/1.74  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 7.03/1.74  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 7.03/1.74  Prover 6: stopped
% 7.03/1.74  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 7.03/1.74  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 7.03/1.74  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 7.76/1.77  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 7.76/1.77  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.76/1.79  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 7.76/1.79  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 7.76/1.79  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 8.11/1.82  Prover 1: Found proof (size 61)
% 8.11/1.82  Prover 1: proved (1210ms)
% 8.13/1.82  Prover 4: stopped
% 8.13/1.83  Prover 7: stopped
% 8.13/1.84  Prover 13: stopped
% 8.13/1.85  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.13/1.85  Prover 11: stopped
% 8.13/1.86  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.13/1.87  Prover 10: stopped
% 8.13/1.88  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.13/1.89  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.13/1.90  Prover 8: stopped
% 8.13/1.90  
% 8.13/1.90  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.13/1.90  
% 8.13/1.91  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.13/1.91  Assumptions after simplification:
% 8.13/1.91  ---------------------------------
% 8.13/1.91  
% 8.13/1.91    (difference)
% 8.13/1.94     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0
% 8.13/1.94      |  ~ (difference(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 8.13/1.94      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] : (member(v0, v2) = v5 &
% 8.13/1.94        member(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i]
% 8.13/1.94    :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (difference(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0,
% 8.13/1.94          v3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 =
% 8.13/1.94          0) & member(v0, v2) = 0 & member(v0, v1) = v4))
% 8.13/1.94  
% 8.13/1.94    (equal_set)
% 8.13/1.95     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_set(v0, v1) =
% 8.13/1.95        v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] : (subset(v1,
% 8.13/1.95          v0) = v4 & subset(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0:
% 8.13/1.95      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (equal_set(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 8.13/1.95      (subset(v1, v0) = 0 & subset(v0, v1) = 0))
% 8.13/1.95  
% 8.13/1.95    (subset)
% 8.13/1.95     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2)
% 8.13/1.95      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) &
% 8.13/1.95        member(v3, v1) = v4 & member(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 8.13/1.95    [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : (
% 8.13/1.95        ~ (member(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | member(v2, v1) = 0))
% 8.13/1.95  
% 8.13/1.95    (thI23)
% 8.13/1.95     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4
% 8.13/1.95        = 0) & difference(v1, v2) = v3 & difference(v1, v0) = v2 & equal_set(v3,
% 8.13/1.95        v0) = v4 & subset(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 8.13/1.95  
% 8.13/1.95    (function-axioms)
% 8.13/1.96     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 8.13/1.96      (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 8.13/1.96      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 8.13/1.96      (difference(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (difference(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 8.13/1.96    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (union(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.13/1.96      (union(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 8.13/1.96      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) =
% 8.13/1.96        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 8.13/1.96      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_set(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.13/1.96      (equal_set(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.13/1.96      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3,
% 8.13/1.96          v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 8.13/1.96    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 8.13/1.96      (member(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 8.13/1.96      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (product(v2) = v1) |  ~ (product(v2) =
% 8.13/1.96        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sum(v2) =
% 8.13/1.96        v1) |  ~ (sum(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 8.13/1.96      v0 |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 8.13/1.96    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (power_set(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.13/1.96      (power_set(v2) = v0))
% 8.13/1.96  
% 8.13/1.96  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 8.13/1.96  --------------------------------------------
% 8.13/1.96  empty_set, intersection, power_set, product, singleton, sum, union,
% 8.13/1.96  unordered_pair
% 8.13/1.96  
% 8.13/1.96  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 8.13/1.96  ---------------------------------
% 8.13/1.96  
% 8.13/1.96  Begin of proof
% 8.13/1.96  | 
% 8.13/1.96  | ALPHA: (subset) implies:
% 8.13/1.97  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 8.13/1.97  |          $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (member(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |
% 8.13/1.97  |            member(v2, v1) = 0))
% 8.13/1.97  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1)
% 8.13/1.97  |            = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~
% 8.13/1.97  |            (v4 = 0) & member(v3, v1) = v4 & member(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)))
% 8.13/1.97  | 
% 8.13/1.97  | ALPHA: (equal_set) implies:
% 8.66/1.97  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_set(v0,
% 8.66/1.97  |              v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] :
% 8.66/1.97  |          (subset(v1, v0) = v4 & subset(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 =
% 8.66/1.97  |                0))))
% 8.66/1.97  | 
% 8.66/1.97  | ALPHA: (difference) implies:
% 8.66/1.97  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 8.66/1.97  |          (difference(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 8.66/1.97  |          $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & member(v0, v2) = 0
% 8.66/1.97  |            & member(v0, v1) = v4))
% 8.66/1.97  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] :
% 8.66/1.97  |        (v4 = 0 |  ~ (difference(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~
% 8.66/1.97  |          $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :
% 8.66/1.97  |          (member(v0, v2) = v5 & member(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0)))
% 8.66/1.97  | 
% 8.66/1.97  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 8.66/1.97  |   (6)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 8.66/1.97  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (member(v3, v2)
% 8.66/1.97  |            = v0))
% 8.66/1.97  | 
% 8.66/1.97  | DELTA: instantiating (thI23) with fresh symbols all_15_0, all_15_1, all_15_2,
% 8.66/1.97  |        all_15_3, all_15_4 gives:
% 8.66/1.97  |   (7)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0) & difference(all_15_3, all_15_2) = all_15_1 &
% 8.66/1.97  |        difference(all_15_3, all_15_4) = all_15_2 & equal_set(all_15_1,
% 8.66/1.97  |          all_15_4) = all_15_0 & subset(all_15_4, all_15_3) = 0 & $i(all_15_1)
% 8.66/1.97  |        & $i(all_15_2) & $i(all_15_3) & $i(all_15_4)
% 8.66/1.97  | 
% 8.66/1.97  | ALPHA: (7) implies:
% 8.66/1.97  |   (8)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0)
% 8.66/1.97  |   (9)  $i(all_15_4)
% 8.66/1.97  |   (10)  $i(all_15_3)
% 8.66/1.98  |   (11)  $i(all_15_2)
% 8.66/1.98  |   (12)  $i(all_15_1)
% 8.66/1.98  |   (13)  subset(all_15_4, all_15_3) = 0
% 8.66/1.98  |   (14)  equal_set(all_15_1, all_15_4) = all_15_0
% 8.66/1.98  |   (15)  difference(all_15_3, all_15_4) = all_15_2
% 8.66/1.98  |   (16)  difference(all_15_3, all_15_2) = all_15_1
% 8.66/1.98  | 
% 8.66/1.98  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_15_4, all_15_3, simplifying with (9),
% 8.66/1.98  |              (10), (13) gives:
% 8.66/1.98  |   (17)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (member(v0, all_15_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) | member(v0,
% 8.66/1.98  |             all_15_3) = 0)
% 8.66/1.98  | 
% 8.66/1.98  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_15_1, all_15_4, all_15_0, simplifying
% 8.66/1.98  |              with (9), (12), (14) gives:
% 8.66/1.98  |   (18)  all_15_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (subset(all_15_1,
% 8.66/1.98  |             all_15_4) = v0 & subset(all_15_4, all_15_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | 
% 8.66/1.98  |             ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 8.66/1.98  | 
% 8.66/1.98  | BETA: splitting (18) gives:
% 8.66/1.98  | 
% 8.66/1.98  | Case 1:
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | |   (19)  all_15_0 = 0
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | | REDUCE: (8), (19) imply:
% 8.66/1.98  | |   (20)  $false
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | | CLOSE: (20) is inconsistent.
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | Case 2:
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | |   (21)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (subset(all_15_1, all_15_4) = v0 &
% 8.66/1.98  | |           subset(all_15_4, all_15_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | | DELTA: instantiating (21) with fresh symbols all_27_0, all_27_1 gives:
% 8.66/1.98  | |   (22)  subset(all_15_1, all_15_4) = all_27_1 & subset(all_15_4, all_15_1) =
% 8.66/1.98  | |         all_27_0 & ( ~ (all_27_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_27_1 = 0))
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | | ALPHA: (22) implies:
% 8.66/1.98  | |   (23)  subset(all_15_4, all_15_1) = all_27_0
% 8.66/1.98  | |   (24)  subset(all_15_1, all_15_4) = all_27_1
% 8.66/1.98  | |   (25)   ~ (all_27_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_27_1 = 0)
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_15_4, all_15_1, all_27_0,
% 8.66/1.98  | |              simplifying with (9), (12), (23) gives:
% 8.66/1.98  | |   (26)  all_27_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 8.66/1.98  | |           member(v0, all_15_1) = v1 & member(v0, all_15_4) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_15_1, all_15_4, all_27_1,
% 8.66/1.98  | |              simplifying with (9), (12), (24) gives:
% 8.66/1.98  | |   (27)  all_27_1 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 8.66/1.98  | |           member(v0, all_15_1) = 0 & member(v0, all_15_4) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | | BETA: splitting (25) gives:
% 8.66/1.98  | | 
% 8.66/1.98  | | Case 1:
% 8.66/1.98  | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | |   (28)   ~ (all_27_0 = 0)
% 8.66/1.99  | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | BETA: splitting (26) gives:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | Case 1:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (29)  all_27_0 = 0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | REDUCE: (28), (29) imply:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (30)  $false
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | CLOSE: (30) is inconsistent.
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | Case 2:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (31)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0, all_15_1)
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |           = v1 & member(v0, all_15_4) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (31) with fresh symbols all_40_0, all_40_1 gives:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (32)   ~ (all_40_0 = 0) & member(all_40_1, all_15_1) = all_40_0 &
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |         member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = 0 & $i(all_40_1)
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | ALPHA: (32) implies:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (33)   ~ (all_40_0 = 0)
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (34)  $i(all_40_1)
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (35)  member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = 0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (36)  member(all_40_1, all_15_1) = all_40_0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_40_1, simplifying with (34),
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |              (35) gives:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (37)  member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = 0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_40_1, all_15_2, all_15_3,
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |              all_15_1, all_40_0, simplifying with (10), (11), (16),
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |              (34), (36) gives:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |   (38)  all_40_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_40_1,
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |             all_15_2) = v1 & member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 =
% 8.66/1.99  | | | |               0) | v1 = 0))
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | BETA: splitting (38) gives:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | Case 1:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |   (39)  all_40_0 = 0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | REDUCE: (33), (39) imply:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |   (40)  $false
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | CLOSE: (40) is inconsistent.
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | Case 2:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |   (41)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_40_1, all_15_2) = v1
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |           & member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (41) with fresh symbols all_52_0, all_52_1 gives:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |   (42)  member(all_40_1, all_15_2) = all_52_0 & member(all_40_1,
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |           all_15_3) = all_52_1 & ( ~ (all_52_1 = 0) | all_52_0 = 0)
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | ALPHA: (42) implies:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |   (43)  member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = all_52_1
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |   (44)  member(all_40_1, all_15_2) = all_52_0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |   (45)   ~ (all_52_1 = 0) | all_52_0 = 0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with 0, all_52_1, all_15_3, all_40_1,
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |              simplifying with (37), (43) gives:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | |   (46)  all_52_1 = 0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | BETA: splitting (45) gives:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | Case 1:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | |   (47)   ~ (all_52_1 = 0)
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | REDUCE: (46), (47) imply:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | |   (48)  $false
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | CLOSE: (48) is inconsistent.
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | Case 2:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | |   (49)  all_52_0 = 0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | REDUCE: (44), (49) imply:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | |   (50)  member(all_40_1, all_15_2) = 0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_40_1, all_15_4, all_15_3,
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | |              all_15_2, simplifying with (9), (10), (15), (34), (50)
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | |              gives:
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | |   (51)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = 0
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | |           & member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = v0)
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/1.99  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (51) with fresh symbol all_67_0 gives:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | |   (52)   ~ (all_67_0 = 0) & member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = 0 &
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | |         member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = all_67_0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | | ALPHA: (52) implies:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | |   (53)   ~ (all_67_0 = 0)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | |   (54)  member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = all_67_0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with 0, all_67_0, all_15_4, all_40_1,
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | |              simplifying with (35), (54) gives:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | |   (55)  all_67_0 = 0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | | REDUCE: (53), (55) imply:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | |   (56)  $false
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | | CLOSE: (56) is inconsistent.
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | End of split
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | End of split
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | End of split
% 8.66/2.00  | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | Case 2:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | |   (57)   ~ (all_27_1 = 0)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | BETA: splitting (27) gives:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | Case 1:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (58)  all_27_1 = 0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | REDUCE: (57), (58) imply:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (59)  $false
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | CLOSE: (59) is inconsistent.
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | Case 2:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (60)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0, all_15_1)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |           = 0 & member(v0, all_15_4) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (60) with fresh symbols all_40_0, all_40_1 gives:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (61)   ~ (all_40_0 = 0) & member(all_40_1, all_15_1) = 0 &
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |         member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = all_40_0 & $i(all_40_1)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | ALPHA: (61) implies:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (62)   ~ (all_40_0 = 0)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (63)  $i(all_40_1)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (64)  member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = all_40_0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (65)  member(all_40_1, all_15_1) = 0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_40_1, all_15_2, all_15_3,
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |              all_15_1, simplifying with (10), (11), (16), (63), (65)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |              gives:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (66)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & member(all_40_1, all_15_2) = v0 &
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |           member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = 0)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (66) with fresh symbol all_48_0 gives:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (67)   ~ (all_48_0 = 0) & member(all_40_1, all_15_2) = all_48_0 &
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |         member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = 0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | ALPHA: (67) implies:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (68)   ~ (all_48_0 = 0)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (69)  member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = 0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (70)  member(all_40_1, all_15_2) = all_48_0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_40_1, all_15_4, all_15_3,
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |              all_15_2, all_48_0, simplifying with (9), (10), (15), (63),
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |              (70) gives:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |   (71)  all_48_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_40_1,
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |             all_15_3) = v0 & member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 =
% 8.66/2.00  | | | |               0) | v1 = 0))
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | BETA: splitting (71) gives:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | Case 1:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | |   (72)  all_48_0 = 0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | REDUCE: (68), (72) imply:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | |   (73)  $false
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | CLOSE: (73) is inconsistent.
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | Case 2:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | |   (74)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = v0
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | |           & member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (74) with fresh symbols all_57_0, all_57_1 gives:
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | |   (75)  member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = all_57_1 & member(all_40_1,
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | |           all_15_4) = all_57_0 & ( ~ (all_57_1 = 0) | all_57_0 = 0)
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.00  | | | | | ALPHA: (75) implies:
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | |   (76)  member(all_40_1, all_15_4) = all_57_0
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | |   (77)  member(all_40_1, all_15_3) = all_57_1
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | |   (78)   ~ (all_57_1 = 0) | all_57_0 = 0
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_40_0, all_57_0, all_15_4,
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | |              all_40_1, simplifying with (64), (76) gives:
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | |   (79)  all_57_0 = all_40_0
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with 0, all_57_1, all_15_3, all_40_1,
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | |              simplifying with (69), (77) gives:
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | |   (80)  all_57_1 = 0
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | BETA: splitting (78) gives:
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | Case 1:
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | |   (81)   ~ (all_57_1 = 0)
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | REDUCE: (80), (81) imply:
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | |   (82)  $false
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | CLOSE: (82) is inconsistent.
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | Case 2:
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | |   (83)  all_57_0 = 0
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (79), (83) imply:
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | |   (84)  all_40_0 = 0
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | REDUCE: (62), (84) imply:
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | |   (85)  $false
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | CLOSE: (85) is inconsistent.
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | End of split
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | End of split
% 8.66/2.01  | | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | | End of split
% 8.66/2.01  | | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | | End of split
% 8.66/2.01  | | 
% 8.66/2.01  | End of split
% 8.66/2.01  | 
% 8.66/2.01  End of proof
% 8.66/2.01  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.66/2.01  
% 8.66/2.01  1417ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------