TSTP Solution File: SET010-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SET010-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:47:01 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31338/SET/SET010-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 100] [nf = 21] [nu = 3] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 838] [nf = 237] [nu = 32] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4381] [nf = 724] [nu = 227] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23454] [nf = 3575] [nu = 916] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 106636] [nf = 14391] [nu = 3921] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 487705] [nf = 64081] [nu = 19604] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1970508] [nf = 275211] [nu = 94757] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 19 secs [nr = 8613654] [nf = 1247419] [nu = 436140] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 14186164] [nf = 1995009] [nu = 673261] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 14186270] [nf = 1995030] [nu = 673266] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 14187269] [nf = 1995248] [nu = 673295] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 14190818] [nf = 1995735] [nu = 673490] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 14209891] [nf = 1998586] [nu = 674179] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 14293073] [nf = 2009402] [nu = 677184] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 14674142] [nf = 2059092] [nu = 692867] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 36 secs [nr = 16156945] [nf = 2270222] [nu = 768020] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 50 secs [nr = 22800091] [nf = 3242430] [nu = 1109403] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 117 secs [nr = 53495783] [nf = 7264825] [nu = 2725482] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 158437134
% resolvents: 139929026 factors: 18508108
% Number of unit clauses generated: 8163751
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 5.15
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 5 [2] = 2 [4] = 5
% Total = 12
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 8163751 [2] = 67968487 [3] = 82304896
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] equal_sets_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] member_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] subset_2 (+)6 (-)0
% [3] difference_3 (+)3 (-)0
% [4] intersection_3 (+)1 (-)0
% [5] union_3 (+)0 (-)1
% ------------------
% Total: (+)11 (-)1
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 12
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 349698793
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 15836892
% Number of successful unifications: 158437134
% Number of unification failures: 85633860
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 391778599
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 309954264
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 24
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 6502441
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 22
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 29
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.76
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 51
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 244070994
% ConstructUnitClause() = 6502448
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 6.41 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 528124
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------