TSTP Solution File: SET002+4 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SET002+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:22:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.20s 2.36s
% Output : Refutation 2.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 5 unt; 6 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
~ equal_set(union(skc1,skc1),skc1),
file('SET002+4.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,axiom,
( subset(u,v)
| member(skf3(v,u),u) ),
file('SET002+4.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(12,axiom,
( ~ member(skf3(u,v),u)
| subset(w,u) ),
file('SET002+4.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(16,axiom,
( ~ member(u,v)
| member(u,union(w,v)) ),
file('SET002+4.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(24,axiom,
( ~ subset(u,v)
| ~ subset(v,u)
| equal_set(v,u) ),
file('SET002+4.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(25,axiom,
( ~ member(u,union(v,w))
| member(u,v)
| member(u,w) ),
file('SET002+4.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(31,plain,
( ~ subset(skc1,union(skc1,skc1))
| ~ subset(union(skc1,skc1),skc1) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[24,3]),
[iquote('0:Res:24.2,3.0')] ).
cnf(45,plain,
( ~ member(skf3(union(u,v),w),v)
| subset(x,union(u,v)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[16,12]),
[iquote('0:Res:16.1,12.0')] ).
cnf(177,plain,
( subset(union(u,v),w)
| member(skf3(w,union(u,v)),u)
| member(skf3(w,union(u,v)),v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,25]),
[iquote('0:Res:7.1,25.0')] ).
cnf(774,plain,
( subset(u,union(v,u))
| subset(w,union(v,u)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,45]),
[iquote('0:Res:7.1,45.0')] ).
cnf(779,plain,
subset(u,union(v,u)),
inference(con,[status(thm)],[774]),
[iquote('0:Con:774.1')] ).
cnf(780,plain,
~ subset(union(skc1,skc1),skc1),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[31,779]),
[iquote('0:MRR:31.0,779.0')] ).
cnf(3203,plain,
( subset(union(u,u),v)
| member(skf3(v,union(u,u)),u) ),
inference(fac,[status(thm)],[177]),
[iquote('0:Fac:177.1,177.2')] ).
cnf(6749,plain,
( subset(union(u,u),u)
| subset(v,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3203,12]),
[iquote('0:Res:3203.1,12.0')] ).
cnf(6766,plain,
subset(union(u,u),u),
inference(con,[status(thm)],[6749]),
[iquote('0:Con:6749.1')] ).
cnf(6767,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[6766,780]),
[iquote('0:UnC:6766.0,780.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SET002+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 02:35:43 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 2.20/2.36
% 2.20/2.36 SPASS V 3.9
% 2.20/2.36 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.20/2.36 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.20/2.36 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.20/2.36 SPASS derived 5837 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3598 clauses.
% 2.20/2.36 SPASS allocated 90852 KBytes.
% 2.20/2.36 SPASS spent 0:00:01.97 on the problem.
% 2.20/2.36 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 2.20/2.36 0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.20/2.36 0:00:00.07 for inferences.
% 2.20/2.36 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 2.20/2.36 0:00:01.77 for the reduction.
% 2.20/2.36
% 2.20/2.36
% 2.20/2.36 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 16 :
% 2.20/2.36 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.20/2.36 Formulae used in the proof : thI14 subset union equal_set
% 2.20/2.36
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------