TSTP Solution File: SET002+3 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SET002+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:25:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.42s 0.97s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET002+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 19:32:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.42/0.97  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.42/0.97  Process 2715 was started by sandbox on n004.cluster.edu,
% 0.42/0.97  Sat Jul  9 19:32:23 2022
% 0.42/0.97  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_2562_n004.cluster.edu".
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_2562_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.42/0.97  set(auto2).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.42/0.97      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.42/0.97      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.42/0.97      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.97  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.42/0.97  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.42/0.97  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.42/0.97  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.42/0.97  clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (8 formulas)
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.42/0.97  1 (all B all C (subset(B,C) -> union(B,C) = C)) # label(subset_union) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  2 (all B all C all D (member(D,union(B,C)) <-> member(D,B) | member(D,C))) # label(union_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  3 (all B all C (B = C <-> subset(B,C) & subset(C,B))) # label(equal_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  4 (all B all C union(B,C) = union(C,B)) # label(commutativity_of_union) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  5 (all B all C (subset(B,C) <-> (all D (member(D,B) -> member(D,C))))) # label(subset_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  6 (all B subset(B,B)) # label(reflexivity_of_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  7 (all B all C (B = C <-> (all D (member(D,B) <-> member(D,C))))) # label(equal_member_defn) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  8 -(all B union(B,B) = B) # label(prove_idempotency_of_union) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.42/0.97  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. union=1. f1=1. f2=1.
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.42/0.97  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.97  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.42/0.97  % Length of proof is 8.
% 0.42/0.97  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.42/0.97  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.42/0.97  % Given clauses 8.
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  1 (all B all C (subset(B,C) -> union(B,C) = C)) # label(subset_union) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  6 (all B subset(B,B)) # label(reflexivity_of_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  8 -(all B union(B,B) = B) # label(prove_idempotency_of_union) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.97  9 subset(A,A) # label(reflexivity_of_subset) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.42/0.97  13 union(c1,c1) != c1 # label(prove_idempotency_of_union) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(8)].
% 0.42/0.97  16 -subset(A,B) | union(A,B) = B # label(subset_union) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.42/0.97  28 union(A,A) = A.  [resolve(16,a,9,a)].
% 0.42/0.97  29 $F.  [resolve(28,a,13,a)].
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  Given=8. Generated=33. Kept=20. proofs=1.
% 0.42/0.97  Usable=8. Sos=10. Demods=1. Limbo=1, Disabled=17. Hints=0.
% 0.42/0.97  Megabytes=0.04.
% 0.42/0.97  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.42/0.97  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.42/0.97  
% 0.42/0.97  Process 2715 exit (max_proofs) Sat Jul  9 19:32:23 2022
% 0.42/0.97  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------