TSTP Solution File: SET002+3 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SET002+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:21:30 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 408.18s 136.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 408.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_idempotency_of_union,conjecture,
! [X1] : union(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ktQd2UJBox/E---3.1_6558.p',prove_idempotency_of_union) ).
fof(subset_union,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
=> union(X1,X2) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ktQd2UJBox/E---3.1_6558.p',subset_union) ).
fof(reflexivity_of_subset,axiom,
! [X1] : subset(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ktQd2UJBox/E---3.1_6558.p',reflexivity_of_subset) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] : union(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_idempotency_of_union]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
union(esk1_0,esk1_0) != esk1_0,
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ~ subset(X5,X6)
| union(X5,X6) = X6 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_union])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X20] : subset(X20,X20),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_of_subset]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
union(esk1_0,esk1_0) != esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( union(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
subset(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SET002+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 16:31:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ktQd2UJBox/E---3.1_6558.p
% 408.18/136.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 408.18/136.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.18/136.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 6637 completed with status 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 408.18/136.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.18/136.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.18/136.50 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 408.18/136.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 6640 completed with status 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Result found by U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 408.18/136.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 408.18/136.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 408.18/136.50 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 408.18/136.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.18/136.50 # Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 408.18/136.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 408.18/136.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 408.18/136.50
% 408.18/136.50 # Proof found!
% 408.18/136.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 408.18/136.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 408.18/136.50 # Parsed axioms : 8
% 408.18/136.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Initial clauses : 17
% 408.18/136.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 408.18/136.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 15
% 408.18/136.50 # Processed clauses : 19
% 408.18/136.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 408.18/136.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 408.18/136.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Generated clauses : 7
% 408.18/136.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 408.18/136.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Paramodulations : 5
% 408.18/136.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # NegExts : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 408.18/136.50 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 408.18/136.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 408.18/136.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 408.18/136.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 408.18/136.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 408.18/136.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 408.18/136.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 408.18/136.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 408.18/136.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 408.18/136.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 408.18/136.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 408.18/136.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 408.18/136.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 408.18/136.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 25
% 408.18/136.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 408.18/136.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 408.18/136.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 408.18/136.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 408.18/136.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 408.18/136.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 408.18/136.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 844
% 408.18/136.50
% 408.18/136.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.18/136.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 408.18/136.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 408.18/136.50 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 408.18/136.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 408.18/136.50
% 408.18/136.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.18/136.50 # User time : 0.006 s
% 408.18/136.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 408.18/136.50 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 408.18/136.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 408.18/136.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------