TSTP Solution File: SCT139+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SCT139+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:16:55 EDT 2024
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 25.63s 3.75s
% Output : CNFRefutation 25.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 con; 1-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 60 ( 25 sgn 25 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_not__Cons__self,axiom,
! [X39,X6,X38] : X38 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X6),X39),X38),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gKsZ81SiwS/E---3.1_26806.p',fact_not__Cons__self) ).
fof(help_c__COMBS__1,axiom,
! [X13,X102,X16,X6,X32,X14] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X14,X32,X6),X16),X102),X13) = hAPP(hAPP(X16,X13),hAPP(X102,X13)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gKsZ81SiwS/E---3.1_26806.p',help_c__COMBS__1) ).
fof(help_c__COMBI__1,axiom,
! [X115,X6] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X6),X115) = X115,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gKsZ81SiwS/E---3.1_26806.p',help_c__COMBI__1) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X39,X6,X38] : X38 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X6),X39),X38),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_not__Cons__self]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X809,X810,X811] : X811 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X810),X809),X811),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1559,X1560,X1561,X1562,X1563,X1564] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1564,X1563,X1562),X1561),X1560),X1559) = hAPP(hAPP(X1561,X1559),hAPP(X1560,X1559)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBS__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
X1 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X2),X3),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Olist_OCons(X4)),X5),X6) != hAPP(X5,X6),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1828,X1829] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X1829),X1828) = X1828,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBI__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),X8),X9) != hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBI(X1),X2) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),c_COMBI(X8)),X9) != hAPP(X9,X9),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SCT139+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Fri May 3 08:41:34 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gKsZ81SiwS/E---3.1_26806.p
% 25.63/3.75 # Version: 3.1.0
% 25.63/3.75 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 25.63/3.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # sh5l with pid 26886 completed with status 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Result found by sh5l
% 25.63/3.75 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 25.63/3.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 25.63/3.75 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 25.63/3.75 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 55s (1) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with pid 26890 completed with status 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S
% 25.63/3.75 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 25.63/3.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 25.63/3.75 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 25.63/3.75 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 25.63/3.75 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 55s (1) cores
% 25.63/3.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 25.63/3.75 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 25.63/3.75
% 25.63/3.75 # Proof found!
% 25.63/3.75 # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 25.63/3.75 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 25.63/3.75 # Parsed axioms : 523
% 25.63/3.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 36
% 25.63/3.75 # Initial clauses : 752
% 25.63/3.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 38
% 25.63/3.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 714
% 25.63/3.75 # Processed clauses : 3861
% 25.63/3.75 # ...of these trivial : 147
% 25.63/3.75 # ...subsumed : 1124
% 25.63/3.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 2590
% 25.63/3.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 201
% 25.63/3.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Backward-subsumed : 57
% 25.63/3.75 # Backward-rewritten : 46
% 25.63/3.75 # Generated clauses : 148797
% 25.63/3.75 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 147049
% 25.63/3.75 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 25.63/3.75 # Paramodulations : 148477
% 25.63/3.75 # Factorizations : 6
% 25.63/3.75 # NegExts : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Equation resolutions : 316
% 25.63/3.75 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Total rewrite steps : 3289
% 25.63/3.75 # ...of those cached : 2091
% 25.63/3.75 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Propositional check models : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 25.63/3.75 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 25.63/3.75 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 25.63/3.75 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 25.63/3.75 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 25.63/3.75 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 25.63/3.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 1870
% 25.63/3.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 351
% 25.63/3.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 25.63/3.75 # Negative unit clauses : 164
% 25.63/3.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 1345
% 25.63/3.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 141810
% 25.63/3.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 316965
% 25.63/3.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 670
% 25.63/3.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 373999
% 25.63/3.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 250925
% 25.63/3.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 741
% 25.63/3.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56143
% 25.63/3.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 245
% 25.63/3.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19496
% 25.63/3.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 105
% 25.63/3.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 25.63/3.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5473312
% 25.63/3.75 # Search garbage collected termcells : 12527
% 25.63/3.75
% 25.63/3.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 25.63/3.75 # User time : 3.084 s
% 25.63/3.75 # System time : 0.107 s
% 25.63/3.75 # Total time : 3.191 s
% 25.63/3.75 # Maximum resident set size: 6056 pages
% 25.63/3.75
% 25.63/3.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 25.63/3.75 # User time : 3.108 s
% 25.63/3.75 # System time : 0.109 s
% 25.63/3.75 # Total time : 3.217 s
% 25.63/3.75 # Maximum resident set size: 2588 pages
% 25.63/3.75 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------