TSTP Solution File: SCT138+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SCT138+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 22:13:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.75s 5.98s
% Output : Refutation 5.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(68,axiom,
~ equal(hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(u),v),w),w),
file('SCT138+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(290,axiom,
equal(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(u,v,w),x),y),z),hAPP(hAPP(x,z),y)),
file('SCT138+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(341,axiom,
equal(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(u,v,w),x),y),z),hAPP(hAPP(x,z),hAPP(y,z))),
file('SCT138+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(5937,plain,
equal(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(u,v,w),hAPP(c_COMBC(x,y,z),x1)),x2),x3),hAPP(hAPP(x1,hAPP(x2,x3)),x3)),
inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[341,290]),
[iquote('0:SpR:341.0,290.0')] ).
cnf(6000,plain,
~ equal(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(u,v,w),c_List_Olist_OCons(x)),y),z),hAPP(y,z)),
inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[341,68]),
[iquote('0:SpL:341.0,68.0')] ).
cnf(6034,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[5937,6000]),
[iquote('0:UnC:5937.0,6000.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SCT138+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 2 06:29:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 5.75/5.98
% 5.75/5.98 SPASS V 3.9
% 5.75/5.98 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 5.75/5.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 5.75/5.98 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.75/5.98 SPASS derived 4564 clauses, backtracked 5 clauses, performed 6 splits and kept 2601 clauses.
% 5.75/5.98 SPASS allocated 124310 KBytes.
% 5.75/5.98 SPASS spent 0:00:05.55 on the problem.
% 5.75/5.98 0:00:00.05 for the input.
% 5.75/5.98 0:00:03.34 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 5.75/5.98 0:00:00.11 for inferences.
% 5.75/5.98 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 5.75/5.98 0:00:01.65 for the reduction.
% 5.75/5.98
% 5.75/5.98
% 5.75/5.98 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 6 :
% 5.75/5.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 5.75/5.98 Formulae used in the proof : fact_not__Cons__self help_c__COMBC__1 help_c__COMBS__1
% 5.75/5.98
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------