TSTP Solution File: SCT138+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SCT138+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:16:50 EDT 2023
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 13.22s 2.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 6 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 con; 1-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 25 sgn; 22 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_not__Cons__self,axiom,
! [X33,X5,X32] : X32 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X5),X33),X32),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.75nSQ3PlhE/E---3.1_17811.p',fact_not__Cons__self) ).
fof(help_c__COMBS__1,axiom,
! [X12,X99,X20,X5,X87,X14] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X14,X87,X5),X20),X99),X12) = hAPP(hAPP(X20,X12),hAPP(X99,X12)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.75nSQ3PlhE/E---3.1_17811.p',help_c__COMBS__1) ).
fof(help_c__COMBI__1,axiom,
! [X117,X5] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X5),X117) = X117,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.75nSQ3PlhE/E---3.1_17811.p',help_c__COMBI__1) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X270,X271,X272] : X272 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X271),X270),X272),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_not__Cons__self]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1226,X1227,X1228,X1229,X1230,X1231] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1231,X1230,X1229),X1228),X1227),X1226) = hAPP(hAPP(X1228,X1226),hAPP(X1227,X1226)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBS__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
X1 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X2),X3),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Olist_OCons(X4)),X5),X6) != hAPP(X5,X6),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1777,X1778] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X1778),X1777) = X1777,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBI__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),X8),X9) != hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBI(X1),X2) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),c_COMBI(X8)),X9) != hAPP(X9,X9),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.17 % Problem : SCT138+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.17/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.17/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:40:28 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.75nSQ3PlhE/E---3.1_17811.p
% 13.22/2.27 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 13.22/2.27 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 13.22/2.27 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # sh5l with pid 17948 completed with status 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Result found by sh5l
% 13.22/2.27 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 13.22/2.27 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 13.22/2.27 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 13.22/2.27 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 55s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with pid 17975 completed with status 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S
% 13.22/2.27 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 13.22/2.27 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 13.22/2.27 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 13.22/2.27 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 13.22/2.27 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 55s (1) cores
% 13.22/2.27 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 13.22/2.27 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.22/2.27
% 13.22/2.27 # Proof found!
% 13.22/2.27 # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 13.22/2.27 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.22/2.27 # Parsed axioms : 523
% 13.22/2.27 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 34
% 13.22/2.27 # Initial clauses : 760
% 13.22/2.27 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 41
% 13.22/2.27 # Initial clauses in saturation : 719
% 13.22/2.27 # Processed clauses : 3695
% 13.22/2.27 # ...of these trivial : 233
% 13.22/2.27 # ...subsumed : 907
% 13.22/2.27 # ...remaining for further processing : 2555
% 13.22/2.27 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 90
% 13.22/2.27 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Backward-subsumed : 19
% 13.22/2.27 # Backward-rewritten : 56
% 13.22/2.27 # Generated clauses : 139757
% 13.22/2.27 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 137427
% 13.22/2.27 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 13.22/2.27 # Paramodulations : 139563
% 13.22/2.27 # Factorizations : 4
% 13.22/2.27 # NegExts : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Equation resolutions : 192
% 13.22/2.27 # Total rewrite steps : 4375
% 13.22/2.27 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Propositional check models : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 13.22/2.27 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 13.22/2.27 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 13.22/2.27 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 13.22/2.27 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 13.22/2.27 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 13.22/2.27 # Current number of processed clauses : 1862
% 13.22/2.27 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 599
% 13.22/2.27 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 11
% 13.22/2.27 # Negative unit clauses : 168
% 13.22/2.27 # Non-unit-clauses : 1084
% 13.22/2.27 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 134070
% 13.22/2.27 # ...number of literals in the above : 179324
% 13.22/2.27 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Current number of archived clauses : 640
% 13.22/2.27 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 188848
% 13.22/2.27 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 118040
% 13.22/2.27 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 482
% 13.22/2.27 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 80814
% 13.22/2.27 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 285
% 13.22/2.27 # BW rewrite match attempts : 92405
% 13.22/2.27 # BW rewrite match successes : 124
% 13.22/2.27 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Condensation successes : 0
% 13.22/2.27 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4170057
% 13.22/2.27
% 13.22/2.27 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.22/2.27 # User time : 1.534 s
% 13.22/2.27 # System time : 0.091 s
% 13.22/2.27 # Total time : 1.625 s
% 13.22/2.27 # Maximum resident set size: 5876 pages
% 13.22/2.27
% 13.22/2.27 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.22/2.27 # User time : 1.555 s
% 13.22/2.27 # System time : 0.093 s
% 13.22/2.27 # Total time : 1.649 s
% 13.22/2.27 # Maximum resident set size: 2560 pages
% 13.22/2.27 % E---3.1 exiting
% 13.22/2.27 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------