TSTP Solution File: SCT137+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SCT137+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:16:50 EDT 2023
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 15.44s 2.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 15.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 6 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 con; 1-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 25 sgn; 22 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_not__Cons__self,axiom,
! [X33,X5,X32] : X32 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X5),X33),X32),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UvLO7XHLn5/E---3.1_24277.p',fact_not__Cons__self) ).
fof(help_c__COMBS__1,axiom,
! [X12,X99,X20,X5,X87,X14] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X14,X87,X5),X20),X99),X12) = hAPP(hAPP(X20,X12),hAPP(X99,X12)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UvLO7XHLn5/E---3.1_24277.p',help_c__COMBS__1) ).
fof(help_c__COMBI__1,axiom,
! [X117,X5] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X5),X117) = X117,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UvLO7XHLn5/E---3.1_24277.p',help_c__COMBI__1) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X270,X271,X272] : X272 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X271),X270),X272),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_not__Cons__self]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1257,X1258,X1259,X1260,X1261,X1262] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1262,X1261,X1260),X1259),X1258),X1257) = hAPP(hAPP(X1259,X1257),hAPP(X1258,X1257)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBS__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
X1 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X2),X3),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Olist_OCons(X4)),X5),X6) != hAPP(X5,X6),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1808,X1809] : hAPP(c_COMBI(X1809),X1808) = X1808,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBI__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),X8),X9) != hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hAPP(c_COMBI(X1),X2) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),c_COMBI(X8)),X9) != hAPP(X9,X9),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.19 % Problem : SCT137+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.20 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.20/0.41 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.20/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.41 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:35:01 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/0.61 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.61 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.UvLO7XHLn5/E---3.1_24277.p
% 15.44/2.59 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 15.44/2.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 15.44/2.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # sh5l with pid 24436 completed with status 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Result found by sh5l
% 15.44/2.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 15.44/2.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 15.44/2.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 15.44/2.59 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 55s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with pid 24457 completed with status 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S
% 15.44/2.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 15.44/2.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 15.44/2.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 15.44/2.59 # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 15.44/2.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 55s (1) cores
% 15.44/2.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 15.44/2.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 15.44/2.59
% 15.44/2.59 # Proof found!
% 15.44/2.59 # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 15.44/2.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 15.44/2.59 # Parsed axioms : 523
% 15.44/2.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 34
% 15.44/2.59 # Initial clauses : 760
% 15.44/2.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 41
% 15.44/2.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 719
% 15.44/2.59 # Processed clauses : 3881
% 15.44/2.59 # ...of these trivial : 232
% 15.44/2.59 # ...subsumed : 1004
% 15.44/2.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 2645
% 15.44/2.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 89
% 15.44/2.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Backward-subsumed : 24
% 15.44/2.59 # Backward-rewritten : 56
% 15.44/2.59 # Generated clauses : 160560
% 15.44/2.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 158096
% 15.44/2.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 15.44/2.59 # Paramodulations : 160368
% 15.44/2.59 # Factorizations : 4
% 15.44/2.59 # NegExts : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Equation resolutions : 190
% 15.44/2.59 # Total rewrite steps : 4644
% 15.44/2.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 15.44/2.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 15.44/2.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 15.44/2.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 15.44/2.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 15.44/2.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 15.44/2.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 1947
% 15.44/2.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 604
% 15.44/2.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 11
% 15.44/2.59 # Negative unit clauses : 169
% 15.44/2.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 1163
% 15.44/2.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 154516
% 15.44/2.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 203468
% 15.44/2.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 645
% 15.44/2.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 192637
% 15.44/2.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 125895
% 15.44/2.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 580
% 15.44/2.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 80755
% 15.44/2.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 295
% 15.44/2.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 91976
% 15.44/2.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 136
% 15.44/2.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 15.44/2.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4889441
% 15.44/2.59
% 15.44/2.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 15.44/2.59 # User time : 1.788 s
% 15.44/2.59 # System time : 0.091 s
% 15.44/2.59 # Total time : 1.879 s
% 15.44/2.59 # Maximum resident set size: 5876 pages
% 15.44/2.59
% 15.44/2.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 15.44/2.59 # User time : 1.811 s
% 15.44/2.59 # System time : 0.095 s
% 15.44/2.59 # Total time : 1.906 s
% 15.44/2.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2552 pages
% 15.44/2.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 15.44/2.59 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------