TSTP Solution File: SCT088-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SCT088-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:16:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.43s 0.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 6 unt; 2 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 4 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
( v_thesis____
| ~ c_List_Odistinct(c_List_Olist_OCons(v_c____,c_List_Olist_OCons(v_d____,c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.luztw8S8CH/E---3.1_7428.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.luztw8S8CH/E---3.1_7428.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_third__alt_0,axiom,
( c_List_Odistinct(c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,c_List_Olist_OCons(v_sko__Arrow__Order__Mirabelle__Xthird__alt__1(X1,X2),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.luztw8S8CH/E---3.1_7428.p',cls_third__alt_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_02,axiom,
v_c____ != v_d____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.luztw8S8CH/E---3.1_7428.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( v_thesis____
| ~ c_List_Odistinct(c_List_Olist_OCons(v_c____,c_List_Olist_OCons(v_d____,c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt) ),
cls_that_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ c_List_Odistinct(c_List_Olist_OCons(v_c____,c_List_Olist_OCons(v_d____,c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_List_Odistinct(c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,c_List_Olist_OCons(v_sko__Arrow__Order__Mirabelle__Xthird__alt__1(X1,X2),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)
| X1 = X2 ),
cls_third__alt_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
v_c____ != v_d____,
cls_CHAINED_0_02 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.17 % Problem : SCT088-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.19/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.19/0.40 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.40 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.19/0.40 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.40 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.19/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.40 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:28:43 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.37/0.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.37/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.luztw8S8CH/E---3.1_7428.p
% 0.43/0.68 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.43/0.68 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.43/0.68 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 7568 completed with status 0
% 0.43/0.68 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.43/0.68 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.43/0.68 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.43/0.68 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.43/0.68 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 90s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 7584 completed with status 0
% 0.43/0.68 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.43/0.68 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.43/0.68 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.43/0.68 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.43/0.68 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.68 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.43/0.68 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.43/0.68
% 0.43/0.68 # Proof found!
% 0.43/0.68 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.43/0.68 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.43/0.68 # Parsed axioms : 674
% 0.43/0.68 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.43/0.68 # Initial clauses : 674
% 0.43/0.68 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.43/0.68 # Initial clauses in saturation : 671
% 0.43/0.68 # Processed clauses : 895
% 0.43/0.68 # ...of these trivial : 49
% 0.43/0.68 # ...subsumed : 93
% 0.43/0.68 # ...remaining for further processing : 753
% 0.43/0.68 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.43/0.68 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.43/0.68 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.43/0.68 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.43/0.68 # Generated clauses : 340
% 0.43/0.68 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 196
% 0.43/0.68 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.43/0.68 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.43/0.68 # Paramodulations : 331
% 0.43/0.68 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.43/0.68 # NegExts : 0
% 0.43/0.68 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.43/0.68 # Total rewrite steps : 339
% 0.43/0.69 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.43/0.69 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.43/0.69 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.43/0.69 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.43/0.69 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.43/0.69 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.43/0.69 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.69 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.69 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.69 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.69 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.69 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.69 # Current number of processed clauses : 219
% 0.43/0.69 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 105
% 0.43/0.69 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.43/0.69 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.43/0.69 # Non-unit-clauses : 100
% 0.43/0.69 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 492
% 0.43/0.69 # ...number of literals in the above : 1075
% 0.43/0.69 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.43/0.69 # Current number of archived clauses : 536
% 0.43/0.69 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29061
% 0.43/0.69 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19361
% 0.43/0.69 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 75
% 0.43/0.69 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120
% 0.43/0.69 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.43/0.69 # BW rewrite match attempts : 70
% 0.43/0.69 # BW rewrite match successes : 54
% 0.43/0.69 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.43/0.69 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.43/0.69 # Termbank termtop insertions : 20460
% 0.43/0.69
% 0.43/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/0.69 # User time : 0.067 s
% 0.43/0.69 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.43/0.69 # Total time : 0.078 s
% 0.43/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 2868 pages
% 0.43/0.69
% 0.43/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/0.69 # User time : 0.260 s
% 0.43/0.69 # System time : 0.040 s
% 0.43/0.69 # Total time : 0.300 s
% 0.43/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 2128 pages
% 0.43/0.69 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.43/0.69 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------