TSTP Solution File: SCT072-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SCT072-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:17:15 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output   : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_8)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    cls_conjecture_0,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    X1 = X2,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    c_List_Odistinct(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10  % Problem    : SCT072-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 11:45:03 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZtqF9Rhi3v/E---3.1_1859.p
% 0.15/0.41  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1936 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.41  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.41  # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1940 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.41  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.41  # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # No proof found!
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.15/0.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.15/0.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.15/0.41  # Processed clauses                    : 9
% 0.15/0.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.15/0.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 8
% 0.15/0.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.15/0.41  # Generated clauses                    : 6
% 0.15/0.41  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.15/0.41  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Paramodulations                      : 6
% 0.15/0.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.15/0.41  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 0.15/0.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.15/0.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.15/0.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/0.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.15/0.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 16
% 0.15/0.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.15/0.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 76
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.41  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1560 pages
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.41  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.15/0.41  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------