TSTP Solution File: SCT052-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SCT052-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:16:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.36s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 4 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
v_b____ != v_c____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oZ28RbsTDV/E---3.1_19244.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
v_b____ = v_c____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oZ28RbsTDV/E---3.1_19244.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
v_b____ != v_c____,
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
v_b____ = v_c____,
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.17 % Problem : SCT052-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.16/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.38 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:28:53 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.36/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.36/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oZ28RbsTDV/E---3.1_19244.p
% 0.36/0.59 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.36/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # new_bool_3 with pid 19323 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.36/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 200s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 101s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 19326 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.36/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.36/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 200s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.36/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.36/0.59
% 0.36/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.36/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.36/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 618
% 0.36/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 369
% 0.36/0.59 # Initial clauses : 249
% 0.36/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 249
% 0.36/0.59 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.36/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.36/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.36/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.36/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.36/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.36/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.36/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 245
% 0.36/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 514
% 0.36/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.36/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12125
% 0.36/0.59
% 0.36/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.59 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.36/0.59 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.36/0.59 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.36/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2632 pages
% 0.36/0.59
% 0.36/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.59 # User time : 0.032 s
% 0.36/0.59 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.36/0.59 # Total time : 0.040 s
% 0.36/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2224 pages
% 0.36/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.36/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------