TSTP Solution File: SCT027-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SCT027-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:17:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),X1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FgNiXmQax3/E---3.1_4657.p',cls_that_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FgNiXmQax3/E---3.1_4657.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_linear__alt_0,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),v_sko__Arrow__Order__Mirabelle__Xlinear__alt__1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FgNiXmQax3/E---3.1_4657.p',cls_linear__alt_0) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),X1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)) ),
    cls_that_0 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),v_sko__Arrow__Order__Mirabelle__Xlinear__alt__1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)),
    cls_linear__alt_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),tc_bool)),X1),c_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_OLin)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : SCT027-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 11:47:33 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.41/0.57  Running first-order model finding
% 0.41/0.57  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FgNiXmQax3/E---3.1_4657.p
% 0.42/0.65  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.42/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 4734 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.42/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.42/0.65  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.65  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 4746 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.42/0.65  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.42/0.65  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.65  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 271s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.009 s
% 0.42/0.65  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.42/0.65  
% 0.42/0.65  # Proof found!
% 0.42/0.65  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 701
% 0.42/0.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Initial clauses                      : 701
% 0.42/0.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.42/0.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 698
% 0.42/0.65  # Processed clauses                    : 26
% 0.42/0.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.42/0.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 0.42/0.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.42/0.65  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.42/0.65  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.42/0.65  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.42/0.65  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.42/0.65  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.42/0.65  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.42/0.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.42/0.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
% 0.42/0.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.42/0.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.42/0.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.42/0.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 672
% 0.42/0.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1669
% 0.42/0.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.42/0.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.42/0.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 21263
% 0.42/0.65  
% 0.42/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.65  # User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.42/0.65  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.42/0.65  # Total time               : 0.031 s
% 0.42/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 3240 pages
% 0.42/0.65  
% 0.42/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.65  # User time                : 0.089 s
% 0.42/0.65  # System time              : 0.020 s
% 0.42/0.65  # Total time               : 0.109 s
% 0.42/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 2276 pages
% 0.42/0.65  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------