TSTP Solution File: SCT002-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SCT002-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:48:13 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.77s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 9 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 150 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 8 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 19 ~; 17 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 116 ( 116 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 5 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 30 !; 0 ?; 31 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_32,type,
sQ0_eqProxy:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).
tff(f861,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f859,f726]) ).
tff(f726,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_L,c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt))),
inference(resolution,[],[f648,f652]) ).
tff(f652,axiom,
! [X5: $i] : ~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Pair(X5,X5,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_L,tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
tff(f648,axiom,
! [X2: $i,X18: $i,X5: $i] :
( hBOOL(c_in(X5,X18,X2))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X18,X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_1) ).
tff(f859,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(v_L,c_Pair(v_x,v_x,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt))),
inference(resolution,[],[f856,f729]) ).
tff(f729,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(v_L,c_Pair(v_x,v_y,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt))),
inference(resolution,[],[f649,f654]) ).
tff(f654,axiom,
hBOOL(c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_y,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_L,tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
tff(f649,axiom,
! [X2: $i,X18: $i,X5: $i] :
( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X5,X18,X2))
| hBOOL(hAPP(X18,X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_0) ).
tff(f856,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_L,c_Pair(X0,v_y,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)))
| hBOOL(hAPP(v_L,c_Pair(X0,v_x,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt))) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f848,f651]) ).
tff(f651,axiom,
c_Relation_Otrans(v_L,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
tff(f848,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(v_L,c_Pair(X0,v_x,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_L,c_Pair(X0,v_y,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt)))
| ~ c_Relation_Otrans(v_L,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f847,f728]) ).
tff(f728,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(v_L,c_Pair(v_y,v_x,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt))),
inference(resolution,[],[f649,f653]) ).
tff(f653,axiom,
hBOOL(c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_x,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt),v_L,tc_prod(tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt,tc_Arrow__Order__Mirabelle_Oalt))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
tff(f847,plain,
! [X2: $i,X6: $i,X5: $i,X12: $i,X13: $i] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X6,c_Pair(X12,X13,X2,X2)))
| hBOOL(hAPP(X6,c_Pair(X5,X13,X2,X2)))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X6,c_Pair(X5,X12,X2,X2)))
| ~ c_Relation_Otrans(X6,X2) ),
inference(forward_literal_rewriting,[],[f846,f649]) ).
tff(f846,plain,
! [X2: $i,X6: $i,X5: $i,X12: $i,X13: $i] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X6,c_Pair(X12,X13,X2,X2)))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X6,c_Pair(X5,X12,X2,X2)))
| ~ c_Relation_Otrans(X6,X2)
| hBOOL(c_in(c_Pair(X5,X13,X2,X2),X6,tc_prod(X2,X2))) ),
inference(forward_literal_rewriting,[],[f845,f648]) ).
tff(f845,plain,
! [X2: $i,X6: $i,X5: $i,X12: $i,X13: $i] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X6,c_Pair(X5,X12,X2,X2)))
| ~ c_Relation_Otrans(X6,X2)
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Pair(X12,X13,X2,X2),X6,tc_prod(X2,X2)))
| hBOOL(c_in(c_Pair(X5,X13,X2,X2),X6,tc_prod(X2,X2))) ),
inference(forward_literal_rewriting,[],[f646,f648]) ).
tff(f646,axiom,
! [X2: $i,X6: $i,X5: $i,X12: $i,X13: $i] :
( ~ c_Relation_Otrans(X6,X2)
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Pair(X5,X12,X2,X2),X6,tc_prod(X2,X2)))
| ~ hBOOL(c_in(c_Pair(X12,X13,X2,X2),X6,tc_prod(X2,X2)))
| hBOOL(c_in(c_Pair(X5,X13,X2,X2),X6,tc_prod(X2,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_trans__def_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SCT002-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 20 00:20:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.33 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.14/0.34 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.76 % (14433)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.76 % (14436)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.76 % (14435)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.76 % (14434)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.76 % (14437)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.76 % (14438)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.76 % (14439)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.76 % (14440)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.77 % (14433)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.77 % (14433)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-14432"
% 0.61/0.77 % (14433)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.61/0.77 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.77 % (14433)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.77 % (14433)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.77 % (14433)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.77
% 0.61/0.77 % (14433)Memory used [KB]: 1560
% 0.61/0.77 % (14433)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.61/0.77 % (14433)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 0.61/0.77 % (14432)Success in time 0.432 s
% 0.61/0.77 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------