TSTP Solution File: ROB016-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ROB016-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tVOk9VJ8q3 true
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:09:45 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ROB016-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tVOk9VJ8q3 true
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:51:09 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.33 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.33 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.34 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.75 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.20/0.75 % BCE start: 11
% 0.20/0.75 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.20/0.75 % PE start: 11
% 0.20/0.75 logic: eq
% 0.20/0.75 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.20/0.75 % done 12 iterations in 0.033s
% 0.20/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.20/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.75 thf(negate_type, type, negate: $i > $i).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(k_type, type, k: $i).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(positive_integer_type, type, positive_integer: $i > $o).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(lemma_3_6, axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 (( ( negate @
% 0.20/0.75 ( add @ ( negate @ Y ) @ ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) !=
% 0.20/0.75 ( X ) ) |
% 0.20/0.75 ( ~( positive_integer @ Vk ) ) |
% 0.20/0.75 ( ( negate @
% 0.20/0.75 ( add @
% 0.20/0.75 Y @
% 0.20/0.75 ( multiply @
% 0.20/0.75 Vk @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) ) ) =
% 0.20/0.75 ( negate @ Y ) ))).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.20/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.75 (((negate @
% 0.20/0.75 (add @ (negate @ X1) @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 0.20/0.75 != (X0))
% 0.20/0.75 | ~ (positive_integer @ X2)
% 0.20/0.75 | ((negate @
% 0.20/0.75 (add @ X1 @
% 0.20/0.75 (multiply @ X2 @
% 0.20/0.75 (add @ X0 @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))))
% 0.20/0.75 = (negate @ X1)))),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lemma_3_6])).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(prove_result, conjecture,
% 0.20/0.75 (( negate @
% 0.20/0.75 ( add @
% 0.20/0.75 e @
% 0.20/0.75 ( multiply @
% 0.20/0.75 k @ ( add @ d @ ( negate @ ( add @ d @ ( negate @ e ) ) ) ) ) ) ) =
% 0.20/0.75 ( negate @ e ))).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.75 (( negate @
% 0.20/0.75 ( add @
% 0.20/0.75 e @
% 0.20/0.75 ( multiply @
% 0.20/0.75 k @ ( add @ d @ ( negate @ ( add @ d @ ( negate @ e ) ) ) ) ) ) ) !=
% 0.20/0.75 ( negate @ e )),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_result])).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.20/0.75 (((negate @
% 0.20/0.75 (add @ e @
% 0.20/0.75 (multiply @ k @ (add @ d @ (negate @ (add @ d @ (negate @ e)))))))
% 0.20/0.75 != (negate @ e))),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl104, plain,
% 0.20/0.75 ((~ (positive_integer @ k)
% 0.20/0.75 | ((negate @ (add @ (negate @ e) @ (negate @ (add @ d @ (negate @ e)))))
% 0.20/0.75 != (d))
% 0.20/0.75 | ((negate @ e) != (negate @ e)))),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(k_positive, axiom, (positive_integer @ k)).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, ( (positive_integer @ k)),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [k_positive])).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(condition, axiom, (( negate @ ( add @ d @ e ) ) = ( negate @ e ))).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, (((negate @ (add @ d @ e)) = (negate @ e))),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condition])).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(robbins_axiom, axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 (( negate @
% 0.20/0.75 ( add @
% 0.20/0.75 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ Y ) ) @
% 0.20/0.75 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) =
% 0.20/0.75 ( X ))).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.20/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.75 ((negate @
% 0.20/0.75 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 0.20/0.75 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 0.20/0.75 = (X0))),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl41, plain,
% 0.20/0.75 (((negate @ (add @ (negate @ e) @ (negate @ (add @ d @ (negate @ e)))))
% 0.20/0.75 = (d))),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl128, plain,
% 0.20/0.75 ((((d) != (d)) | ((negate @ e) != (negate @ e)))),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.20/0.75 [zip_derived_cl104, zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl41])).
% 0.20/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl129, plain, ($false),
% 0.20/0.75 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl128])).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 % Terminating...
% 1.35/0.84 % Runner terminated.
% 1.35/0.85 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------